Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Palestinians protest hamas?

  1. May 21, 2003 #1
    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030520/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_palestinians_390
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 21, 2003 #2
    Well, protesting Israeli crimes doesn't seem to do any good, now does it? It can't get much worse...at least the Israeli troops managed to take out some terrorist...ummm...trees?
     
  4. May 21, 2003 #3
    Everyone fights, USA is doing it, they're doing it. I am one who would like certain populations of a given static to decrease. So, people are dying every second. You can't expect two groups who continuously break one of my rules (rule 2) for thousands of years to give in that easily?

    It's a testament to my claim of how emotionally driven mythology can be within a person or group of people.
     
  5. May 21, 2003 #4
    What, exactly, are you saying here?
     
  6. May 21, 2003 #5
    Do you think that this Palestinian denouncement of terrorism could be a sign (as part of a trend) that relations between Israel/Israelis and Palestine/ Palestinians may mend in the near future?
     
  7. May 21, 2003 #6
    Nope...not as long as radical elements on each side refuse to accept that their violent activities are wrong. I wonder how many future terrorists were created when these troops gunned down kids with rocks from a tank? How many, when they uprooted thousands of trees out of nothing more than spite and hatred?
     
  8. May 21, 2003 #7
    But surely these Palestinian protesters are acknowledging the waste of the violent activities of hamas and Israel. Maybe it will catch on? Maybe not?
     
  9. May 21, 2003 #8
    Maybe not...it has always been obvious to both sides that a little violence is all it takes to derail the peace process. And, of course, extremists on both sides take advantage of that fact.
     
  10. May 21, 2003 #9

    kat

    User Avatar

    Dan- Yes, this is a good thing. These terrorist factions aren't simply a result of israeli attacks, they are supported by other arabic countries, use similar recruiting techniques as the religious cults that were so prevelant in the 80's, purposely seeking out troubled teens, standing on street corners and feeding them stories of rewards etc., they are supported by surrounding Arabic states that have their own strategical purpose and rewards in keeping the israeli-Palestinian conflict escalated. Many of the top men in these organizations are also heavily involved in "black market", drug money, and other activities that are financially beneficial to themselves at the cost of innocent lives, on both sides of the conflict.
    Parents in Palestine have long been accused of traitors when keeping their children from the streets and preventing them from taking part in stone throwing, molatov cocktail tossing etc. They have been called traitors (by Arafat and other top leaders of the many organizations under PLO organization) if they don't allow these men into their homes, their neighborhoods, their mosques. I'm very glad to see them take a pro-active move against these men, they are poison to the palestinian people.


    Don't mind Zero, he has to include his hatred of israel in any related post or it just wouldn't seem "fair" and honest to him.
     
  11. May 21, 2003 #10

    kat

    User Avatar


    yes of course, spite and hatred, how could it be anything else?

     
  12. May 21, 2003 #11
    Boy, Kat, you're really pushing your vlack/white bias today, aren't you? Anything that isn't pro-Israel must be based on 'hatred', and anything that is pro-Israel must be 100% truth. Of course, it makes perfect sensre to destroy people's homes, and farms, and sources of food and income, in the name of safety!. Let's just shoot children too, so that terrorists don't have anyone to hide behind.


    Your constant rationalization of murder, combined with your projection of your own hatred on me, is simply wrongheaded.
     
  13. May 21, 2003 #12
    I think what hurts both sides is an attitude of "Let's punish ALL of them for the actions of a few." The Palestinians target any Israeli they can reach, while the Israelis always manage to bulldoze something Palestinian on a regular basis.
     
  14. May 21, 2003 #13
    There is a deep split I think in pretty much all Arab countries between highly vocal pro-violence Islamist types, and a large segment of the general public that is sick of it. Because of the nature of extremism, the claims of the Islamists to to be representing freedom, independence, Islam, morality, etc, and a "you're either with us or you're against us attitude," the latter elements have usually been unwilling or afraid to stand up and confront the radicals. There seem to have been signs this is changing recently; it isa very good thing IMO....

    For perspective, think of how many Republicans stood up to defend Lott's racism and Santorum's anti-gay sentiment, or the lack of WMDs in Iraq... or how many liberals seem unwilling to condemn Cuba. Multiply that by a hundred or so, and there you go....
     
  15. May 21, 2003 #14
    You said that the did it out of nothing but spite and hatred, and then kat posted that clip to show the official reason for the razingsm, which was not spite and hatred. Then you said that she was reationalizing murder.

    To be fair, she did not try to justify it (at least not explicitly). She just said (explicitly) that there were other reasons beside spite and hatred, at least according to the official reason.
     
  16. May 21, 2003 #15

    drag

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I wonder what the US would do if there
    were rockets landing in NY almost every day.
    Somehow, the words "ground military intervention"
    sound too soft here, I think the word "tomahawks"
    would more likely come to mind in such a case. :wink:

    Live long and prosper.
     
  17. May 22, 2003 #16




    You said that the did it out of nothing but spite and hatred, and then kat posted that clip to show the official reason for the razingsm, which was not spite and hatred. Then you said that she was reationalizing murder.

    To be fair, she did not try to justify it (at least not explicitly). She just said (explicitly) that there were other reasons beside spite and hatred, at least according to the official reason.
    [/QUOTE]

    Right...and some people accept even the lamest official responses for why Israeli troops terrorise Palestinian civilians.
     
  18. May 23, 2003 #17

    kat

    User Avatar

    Right...and some people accept even the lamest official responses for why Israeli troops terrorise Palestinian civilians. [/B][/QUOTE]


    I'm not sure what your definition of lame is in regards to protecting the lives of civilians within your own country but, obviously, the people of Sderot who are on the recieving end of the Qassam 2 with it's 11 to 14 pounds of explosives and range of around 5 to 6 miles with the potential to deliver non-conventional warheads as "lame". I'm also sure that they consider it convenient that the groves the militants hide in while lobbing their missiles just so happen to fall with the 5-6 mile range.

    So, I suppose, since tearing down trees that provide coverage for missile lobbing as "lame" you have an alternate plan to provide protection for the israeli citizens living within the "green line" in sderot?

    Personally, I find it far less lame, and far more positive for the Palestinian people to take control of the situation, particularly since, typically, these same militants will escalate violence prior to any meeting on resolving territorial issues that involve recognizing israel without ROR. Arafat, and surrounding arabic countries, who BTW sponsor militants and help undermine peace process will continue, as they have in the past, to sacrifice the palestinian people for their OWN benefit.
    If they don't, then they better all buckle their seatbelts because with the proposal of Abbas, Bush and Sharon meeting soon, the ride is only going to get deadlier and rockier. Sharon will not agree to allowing militants to attack either through suicide or missiles without taking measures to protect the Israeli citizens. If Abbas cannot control them, if Arafat cannot control them, or undermines Abbas's ability to, or if the people of Palestine do not refuse them..then at some point in time someone will have to step in and control the situation for them.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Palestinians protest hamas?
Loading...