I am a little confused about how to generally go about applying Stokes's Theorem to cylinders, in order to calculate a line integral. If, for example you have a cylinder whose height is about the z axis, I get perfectly well how to parameterize the x and y components, using polar coordinates, for example, but what about z (and thus dz)? If you have a vector field that is dependent on z, such as F= (z,x,yz) (it doesn't matter which, I am just listing one for clarity) and you want to replace with polar coordinates, what approach do you take with z, when projecting your surface about a closed loop?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

What confuses me is if you have a sphere, or something similar, you find the shadow of the surface, which is effectively the z-value where the circumference is widest-- but with the cylinder, all z-values are at locations with equal circumference about the x-y plane. Is it the bottom? Top? Somewhere in between?

Thanks!!!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Parameterizing z-value of Cylinder in Line Integral Projection (Using Stokes Theorem)

Loading...

Similar Threads - Parameterizing value Cylinder | Date |
---|---|

I Derivative and Parameterisation of a Contour Integral | Feb 7, 2018 |

I What is the purpose of Arc-Length Parameterization? | Sep 18, 2016 |

I Parameterize an offset ellipse and calculate the surface area | Mar 16, 2016 |

Question on Arc Length parameterization. | Apr 8, 2013 |

Parameterized function crosses own path | Feb 27, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**