Considering the problem of finding the area under a parametric curve, I thought,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

y=y(t), x=x(t)

A=[inte]ydx=[inte]yx'(t)dt

That result seems straighforward.

I also thought, what if I let the VVFv=<x(t),y(t)> represent the same curve. To find the area, under the curve (I have in the back of my mind the concept of velocity and position), I would solve the integral,r=[inte]vdt.

Should these two results be related? I think they should, but the math shows they aren't. Should the magnitidue of the latter equal the absolute value of the former? Looks like no. Why not?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Parametrics and vector valued functions

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**