Parity Conservation: Determine E for P=-1

In summary, the conversation discusses a one-dimensional box with energy probabilities and a measured parity. The conversation then delves into the determination of energy based on the initial state and how the energy would change if the original parity were different. It is determined that a negative parity measurement results in the particle being in the only allowed basis state with negative parity, while a positive parity measurement could result in the particle being in either of the two even parity eigenstates.
  • #1
Ed Quanta
297
0
Ok,so check this situation out.

We have a one-dimensional box with walls at (-a/2,a/2). We know that the particle is in a state with energy probabilities

P(E1)=1/3, P(E2)=1/3, and P(E3)=1/3 while P(En)=0 for all n not equal to 1,2,3.

The parity is measured ideally and -1 is found. If some time later E is measured, what value is found? What is the answer if the original measurement found the parity to be 1?


I don't understand how if the parity of the state is measured ideally that -1 is found, since
we know Psi(x,0)= (square root of (2/3a))(cos(n(pi)x/a) + sin(2n(pi)x/a) + cos(3n(pi)x/a)

And when we take P, where P is the parity operator of our function, we note that only the sin function will become negative.

solving for <P> then, <P>= 1/3 + (-1/3) + 1/3=1/3, correct? This does not equal 1.


Anyway, given the initial state, now I am pretty sure that
Psi(x,t)= (square root of (2/3a))(cos(n(pi)x/a)e^-iE1t/hbar +
sin(2n(pi)x/a)e^-iE2t/hbar + cos(3n(pi)x/a)e^-iE3t/hbar)

How do I determine energy from this?
And then how will the energy change if the original parity happened to be -1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ed Quanta said:
And when we take P, where P is the parity operator of our function, we note that only the sin function will become negative.

Bingo. You measure a negative parity, so you must have found the particle in the only allowed basis state that has negative parity.

solving for <P> then, <P>= 1/3 + (-1/3) + 1/3=1/3, correct? This does not equal 1.

But they didn't say that you obtained an expectation value of -1, they said that you measured the particle with a parity of -1. That means that you found it in a negative parity eigenstate, and there's only one of those available, so...

Furthermore, if you find the parity to be 1, then you could be in either of the two even parity eigenstates.
 
  • #3


The parity conservation law states that the parity of a physical system remains unchanged under certain transformations, such as reflection or inversion. In this case, we are given a one-dimensional box and the energy probabilities for a particle in that box. The parity is then measured and found to be -1. This means that the state of the system is not symmetric under reflection.

To determine the energy in this situation, we can use the equation E = n^2h^2/(8mL^2), where n is the quantum number, h is Planck's constant, m is the mass of the particle, and L is the length of the box. Since the parity is -1, we know that the quantum number n must be odd. This means that the only possible energy values are E1 = 9h^2/(8ma^2), E2 = 25h^2/(8ma^2), and E3 = 49h^2/(8ma^2).

If we were to measure the energy after finding the parity to be -1, we would find one of these three energy values with equal probability.

If the original measurement had found the parity to be 1, then the state of the system would be symmetric under reflection. This means that the quantum number n would be even, and the possible energy values would be E1 = 4h^2/(8ma^2), E2 = 16h^2/(8ma^2), and E3 = 36h^2/(8ma^2). In this case, if we were to measure the energy after finding the parity to be 1, we would find one of these three energy values with equal probability.

In summary, the measurement of parity does not directly give us the energy value, but it constrains the possible energy values based on the symmetry of the system. The actual energy value is determined through the use of the Schrodinger equation and the appropriate boundary conditions for the given system.
 

1. What is parity conservation?

Parity conservation is a fundamental principle in physics that states that the laws of physics should remain the same if the spatial coordinates of a physical system are inverted. In other words, if the system is reflected in a mirror, its behavior should remain the same.

2. How is parity conservation related to the concept of P=-1?

In physics, P is the symbol for parity and it refers to the spatial inversion of a physical system. The value of P can be either +1 or -1, with +1 representing even parity and -1 representing odd parity. Therefore, parity conservation is related to the concept of P=-1 because it refers to the conservation of odd parity in physical systems.

3. Why is it important to determine E for P=-1?

The value of E, or the energy of a physical system, is an important factor in understanding the behavior and properties of that system. By determining E for P=-1, we can gain a better understanding of how parity conservation affects the energy of a physical system and how it influences its behavior.

4. What methods are used to determine E for P=-1?

There are various experimental and theoretical methods used to determine E for P=-1. Some of these include observing the behavior of particles in high-energy collisions, studying the properties of atomic nuclei, and using mathematical equations and models to calculate the energy of a system.

5. How does parity conservation impact our understanding of the universe?

Parity conservation is a fundamental principle in physics that helps us understand the symmetry and behavior of the universe. It has been used to explain various phenomena, such as the behavior of subatomic particles and the structure of atomic nuclei. By studying parity conservation, we can gain a deeper understanding of the fundamental laws that govern our universe.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
884
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
781
Replies
1
Views
614
Replies
3
Views
401
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
745
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
793
Replies
3
Views
796
Back
Top