• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Parsecs/Distance accuracy

  • Thread starter odoital
  • Start date
5
0
1. Homework Statement

The planned Gaia satellite is a successor to Hipparcos. It will have an astrometric accuracy of 24 micro-arcseconds, and be able to detect Cepheid variable stars in the Magellanic clouds (~ 70kpc away). Estimate how accurately Gaia will determine distances to these Cepheids

2. Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution

I haven't really done any cosmology before so this is new to me. I've just defined a parsec in the previous question as a star 1pc away having a parallax of one arcsecond.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a8/Parsec.png [Broken]

I'm not sure what value this question actually wants as an answer :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
Take your picture and replace the base distance with the approximate distance to the Magellanic cloud. Now what is the angle. (Hint: this is really trigonometry - not cosmology).
 
5
0
Hmm, i tried that and the angle came out as virtually 0 arc seconds
 
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
You're right! It is virtually zero. But it is NOT zero. Express the answer in micro-arcseconds. This whole game is about tiny angles.
 
5
0
ok, well converting to meters:

1AU = 149.6 x 10^9 m
70kpc = (70,000) * (3.086 x 10^16) m

Angle, say, x = 3.97 x 10^-9 degrees = 14.28 microarcseconds
 
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
So given the astrometric accuracy of Gaia, will it be able to accurately measure distances on this scale using parallax?
 
Last edited:
5
0
Given that it can only(!) read to 24micro-arcseconds, no - as the calculated angle is 14.28 microarcseconds. But I'm confused at the way the question's worded - "estimate HOW ACCURATELY Gaia will determine distances to these Cepheids", i'm not sure what physical quantity it's asking for
 
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
Aside from saying "not very accurately at all", I'm not sure. You could say if the true parallax is 14, Gaia could measure anything between 0 and 38, implying it's somewhere between around half the true distance and infinity. Not very satisfying, eh? If it's any consolation, if you measured LOTS of stars and averaged the results - you could do a lot better. And I think that's what they do.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: Parsecs/Distance accuracy

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
429
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
797
Top