Partial Derivatives Proof

  • #1

Homework Statement


Suppose that the equation F(x,y,z) = 0 implicitly defines each of the three variables x, y and z as functions of the other two: z = f(x,y), y = g(x,z), z = h(y,z). If F is differentiable and Fx, Fy and Fz are all nonzero, show that

[itex]\frac{∂z}{∂x}[/itex] [itex]\frac{∂x}{∂y}[/itex] [itex]\frac{∂y}{∂z}[/itex] = -1


The Attempt at a Solution



I have been scribbling away at this for a little while now and can't see it.
I assume that I need to prove that each partial derivative = -1, thus -1*-1*-1=-1

Don't want you guys to simply give me the answer but any tips on where to start would be greatly appreciated =D
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
619
Try a simple example. Say, x+2y+3z=0. You can then solve for f, g and h explicitly and show your product is (-1). And you'll also see that not all of the partials need to be (-1). That should be a good hint to start.
 
  • #3
Thanks for the reply.
That worked...but how can I solve for all cases?
 
  • #4
I tried ax+by+cz=0 and solved it and ended up with -1....but this still doesn't solve it for all cases does it?
 
  • #5
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
619
I tried ax+by+cz=0 and solved it and ended up with -1....but this still doesn't solve it for all cases does it?

It sort of does. Since F is differentiable and invertible it can be approximated by a linear function well enough. If you want to be more formal then use the chain rule (read all of the following d's as partial derivatives). E.g. let's try finding dx/dy in terms of F. When you are taking a partial derivative you need to specify what variable is being held constant. In this case it must be z. Now the chain rule for partial derivatives tells you (dF/dx)*(dx/dy)+(dF/dy)*(dy/dy)+(dF/dz)*(dz/dy)=0, right? If you hold z constant, can you solve that for dx/dy in terms of partial derivatives of F? Repeat that for dz/dx and dy/dz and multiply the results together.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Thank you so much for that.
I had tried using the chain rule, but I mixed it up =( I only started teaching myself partial derivatives 2 days ago so I'll give my self a break for stuffing up =P

Thank you again, I'll give that a shot and see how it goes
 
  • #7
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
619
Thank you so much for that.
I had tried using the chain rule, but I mixed it up =( I only started teaching myself partial derivatives 2 days ago so I'll give my self a break for stuffing up =P

Thank you again, I'll give that a shot and see how it goes

That's ok. This one is a little subtle. I had to ponder it a while.
 
  • #8
haha I'm glad you had trouble with it to, makes me feel less dumb =P
 

Related Threads on Partial Derivatives Proof

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
943
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
682
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
906
Top