Can the energy of a particle ensemble in QFT be bounded over time?

In summary, in QFT, a particle state is considered to be an asymptotic state with a well-defined energy. However, even if the energy of a particle is well-defined, it may have an energy that is arbitrarily close to infinite. If we consider the wave packet for, e.g., an electron that happens to be part of a desk in my office, there is some finite, non-zero probability that the particle has more momentum, and hence more energy, than the most energetic cosmic ray ever to hit the Earth.
  • #36
asimov42 said:
Thanks @LeandroMdO - so you would say that the continuous momentum function is simply an approximation? But certainly provides accurate predictions over any range we can measure...

It's not the continuity that is an approximation, but the choice of a wave packet with a Gaussian form. In reality it doesn't have to be Gaussian. We use Gaussians for convenience of study and because the central limit theorem ensures it's a good approximation for many relevant situations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Sorry @LeandroMdO - I should have said continuous and non-zero over the whole real line? A continuous function could have a value of zero, of course.
 
Last edited:
  • #38
vanhees71 said:
You just construct a single-particle state with a square-integrable wave function in momentum space

This is a free particle wave packet, so it would not describe, for example, an electron bound in an atom. The OP is talking about making a measurement of momentum on an electron in such a bound state. Scattering theory, which is basically what the wave packet you wrote down applies to, cannot be used in such a case.
 

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
790
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
999
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top