Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

PASCO lab on the interferometer

  1. Oct 10, 2005 #1
    Hey guys,

    I did the PASCO lab on the interferometer the other day and just have a problem that I wouldn't mind knowing what caused it.

    here is the link to the PASCO lab manual:

    Just in case you want to see what we had to do.

    Anyway the problem occurred in Experiment 3 in that lab manual.
    We had to measure the index of refraction of a laser by placing a glass plate in the arrangement given in the above manual.
    Now I did that and tried to make it so that the glass plate was as perpendicular to the laser as I could make it, so as to reduce the effect of the secondary interference pattern. But I still had a very distinct pattern that made it hard to count the number of fringe transitions with varying the angle of the glass plate.

    Now the problem is that when I started changing the angle of the glass plate, the fringe transitions were appearing to go to the left, but then when I had moved it maybe 2 degrees the fringe transitions momentarily stopped and then continued, but this time they were 'moving' in the opposite direction. It continued moving in the opposite direction (right) from 2 degrees to the end limit (10 degrees). I asked another group if that happened to them and they said it hadn't so I was just wondering if any of you guys knew what might cause something like that to happen?

    I'd appreciate any ideas that I could further look into.

  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 11, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I'd be willing to bet that when you started with your glass plate, you weren't precisely perpendicular but were a little too far on the far side. In other words, you were probably perpendicular when you got to 2 degrees.

    Try using 2 degrees as your "zero" instead of 0 degrees. If you do this, do you get the correct index of refraction for the glass?

  4. Oct 11, 2005 #3
    ahhh ok...that does work out to a better value.

    Thanks for that : )
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook