Passive and Active Gravitational Mass of Photons

  • I
  • Thread starter SteveDC
  • Start date
  • #1
SteveDC
39
0
As I understand a photon has zero rest mass (as far as we can tell) but it does have a passive gravitational mass in order for it to be able to respond to gravity.

But I've been shown that passive gravitational mass should be equal to active gravitational mass, and if this is true and photons have active gravitational mass then is it the case that a beam of light will have its own gravitational field? So would two beams of parallel light in an empty Universe (i.e. no gravity from other objects) be drawn to each other?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2021 Award
19,332
9,521
You have a too classical view of how gravity works. It isunclear what you think gravitational mass means for objects travelling at or close to the speed of light. You cannot apply Newtonian gravity, you need to apply general relativity.
 
  • #3
phyzguy
Science Advisor
5,026
2,025
Yes. An EM wave has a non-zero stress-energy tensor, so it will distort spacetime and have its own gravitational field. Note that the effect would be extraordinarily weak.
 
  • #4
SteveDC
39
0
Applying GR should give the same conclusion though shouldn't it? If photons have passive mass and therefore have active mass they are able to curve space.
 
  • #5
Dale
Mentor
Insights Author
2021 Award
32,946
10,194
To further what @Orodruin and @phyzguy said, in GR mass is not the source of the gravitational field, the stress energy tensor is. Light has energy and momentum so it gravitates, regardless of the fact that it is massless.

The gravitational field of light is called a pp wave spacetime.
 
  • #6
Jonathan Scott
Gold Member
2,341
1,108
I've heard that parallel light beams do not interact with one another gravitationally, but antiparallel beams would attract each other. I think it's possible to guess that anyway from the fact that the mutual acceleration between massive particles travelling at the same speed at very nearly the speed of light in the same direction is time dilated to near zero.
 
  • #7
pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
10,162
1,320
As I understand a photon has zero rest mass (as far as we can tell) but it does have a passive gravitational mass in order for it to be able to respond to gravity.

But I've been shown that passive gravitational mass should be equal to active gravitational mass, and if this is true and photons have active gravitational mass then is it the case that a beam of light will have its own gravitational field? So would two beams of parallel light in an empty Universe (i.e. no gravity from other objects) be drawn to each other?

I'd be curious to see where you were shown that passive gravitational mass was equal to active gravitational mass. Do you have a reference? Can it be tracked down to a peer-reviewed paper?

To answer your question, as others have pointed out, parallel beams of light won't attract each other, while anti-parallel beams will attract.
 
  • #8
38,369
16,150
I've heard that parallel light beams do not interact with one another gravitationally, but antiparallel beams would attract each other.

Yes, and this result can be derived from the stress-energy tensor of the light beams. MTW has a brief discussion of this, and (IIRC) refers to a paper by Tolman that was the first publication of the result.
 

Suggested for: Passive and Active Gravitational Mass of Photons

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
911
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
647
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Top