Path of integration

  • Thread starter buzzmath
  • Start date
  • #1
112
0

Homework Statement


show that the integral of z^i dz from -1 to 1 is equal to (1+e^(-pi))/x * (1-i)
where the path of integration is any contour from -1 to 1 above the x axis

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I wrote z^i as e^iLogz and I think all I really need to do is find the antiderivitive of e^i*logz where -pi/2<argz<3pi/2
this antiderivative is giving me trouble I tried to break it up into e^i*lnr-theta
and then get -e^(i*lnr)*[e^(3pi/2)-e^(-pi/2)] but I can't get it to work
can anyone help?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,260
619
An antiderivative of x^n is still x^(n+1)/(n+1) even when n is i.
 
  • #3
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,833
963
Why find an anti-derivative? Why not integrate, as the problem says, on a contour that stays above the real axis- such as the upper half of the unit circle? On that circle, [itex]z= e^{i\theta}[/itex] so [itex]z^i= e^{-\theta}[/itex]. It should be easy to integrate that from [itex]\theta= \pi[/itex] to [itex]0[/itex] (not from 0 to [itex]\pi[/itex]- that would be the lower semi-circle.

Of course, if [itex]z= e^{i\theta}[/itex] then [itex]dz= ie^{i\theta}d\theta[/itex].
 
  • #4
184
0
Why find an anti-derivative? Why not integrate...

what's the difference between integrating something and finding the anti-derivative?
 
  • #5
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,260
619
what's the difference between integrating something and finding the anti-derivative?

I think Halls is right pedagogically. The problem with using the antiderivative is making sure the answer corresponds to the correct path choice. In this case, choosing the correct logs for the endpoints. But you can do it either way. If you're careful.
 
  • #6
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,833
963
what's the difference between integrating something and finding the anti-derivative?

Good point! What I mean was that you don't have to find an anti-derivative of zi. After you specialize to the contour you get an integral of a real valued function which, hopefully, will have a simpler anti-derivative.

(There is also the slight matter of showing that the integral of the complex function is independent of the particular path you use. Strictly speaking, to use the anti-derivative directly you must show that the integral is the same for ANY path. Here, it isn't. Because of the "multivaluedness" of zi, the value depends on the choice of branch and the negative i-axis is a cut line for zi. The integral is independent of the path as long as you do not cross the negative i-axis which is the reason for using a path in the upper half plane.)

I am a bit puzzled by that 'x' in the denominator in your original post. Was that a typo?
 
  • #7
184
0
Good point! What I mean was that you don't have to find an anti-derivative of zi. After you specialize to the contour you get an integral of a real valued function which, hopefully, will have a simpler anti-derivative.

(There is also the slight matter of showing that the integral of the complex function is independent of the particular path you use. Strictly speaking, to use the anti-derivative directly you must show that the integral is the same for ANY path. Here, it isn't. Because of the "multivaluedness" of zi, the value depends on the choice of branch and the negative i-axis is a cut line for zi. The integral is independent of the path as long as you do not cross the negative i-axis which is the reason for using a path in the upper half plane.)

Thanks for that answer.

I am a bit puzzled by that 'x' in the denominator in your original post. Was that a typo?

I'm not the original poster
 

Related Threads on Path of integration

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
921
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
924
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
910
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Top