The Pauli Exclusion Principle and Repulsive Forces in Atoms

In summary, the repulsive forces between atoms at small internuclear distances are mainly due to nuclear repulsion, which is not counterbalanced by the more attractive electronic contributions. As the nuclei approach, the Coulombic potential energy due to nuclear repulsion becomes significant and the energy stored up in electron-nuclear interactions changes. However, this is overwhelmed by the rapidly increasing repulsive internuclear interaction.
  • #1
eightsquare
96
1
Some time ago I asked about contact forces and was directed to read about the Pauli exclusion principle and the resulting L-J potential before a detailed explanation was given explaining why the electrons start interacting significantly, electromagnetically, even if the atom as a whole is electromagnetically equal, when the electrons come close. I've read these articles bit by bit for over a month now, and I think I understand them fairly well. Could someone give me a detailed explanation now of how the Pauli exclusion principle relates to the electromagnetic force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I assume you are referring to the LJ 6-12 potential.

The R^6 term is an attractive part that arises from dispersion forces. The calculation, showing that R^7 is a better approximation, is outlined in the textbook Molecular Quantum Mechanics by PW Atkins.

The R^12 term is arbitrary. A better description of the repulsive part of the potential is Aexp(-Br)/r (Bohr potential). The main contribution is internuclear repulsion.
 
  • #3
gadong said:
I assume you are referring to the LJ 6-12 potential.

The R^6 term is an attractive part that arises from dispersion forces. The calculation, showing that R^7 is a better approximation, is outlined in the textbook Molecular Quantum Mechanics by PW Atkins.

The R^12 term is arbitrary. A better description of the repulsive part of the potential is Aexp(-Br)/r (Bohr potential). The main contribution is internuclear repulsion.

gadong, I don't really have anything constructive to contribute here, with the exception that I think it would help you to know that he is trying to better understand contact forces. Here is the original thread...

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=700663
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #4
OK, thanks MG. I'll write a few more things to maybe clarify.

In day to day life, the forces of contact become apparent when objects are compressed relative to their equilibrium separation, which represents a potential energy minimum. The closer they approach, the more the potential energy of the system (the objects in contact) increases, so a force is required in order to do the work of compression. That's the contact force that we experience.

Potential energy curves such as the LJ potential represent the system energy as a function of displacement from the equilibrium separation. The LJ potential is not suitable for describing solid materials, but is qualitatively correct. Interestingly, there is in fact a "universal" compression behaviour that applies to most solids (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose–Vinet_equation_of_state).

However, the atomic displacements that we encounter in out day to day contact with metrials are usually small, and can mostly be understood by assuming a simpler harmonic potential. The properties of materials under small compressions are described using the so-called elastic constants.

In general, materials that have high cohesive energies (deep potential wells between atoms) tend to be difficult to compress (example: tungsten). However, the actual behaviour depends on the matter in which forces are applied to the material (e.g. compressive versus shear forces). In practical research, it is feasible to predict compressive forces for model systems (e.g. nanoscale tip indenting a surface), but frictional forces cannot be predicted with accuracy.
 
  • #5
"In day to day life, the forces of contact become apparent when objects are compressed relative to their equilibrium separation, which represents a potential energy minimum. The closer they approach, the more the potential energy of the system (the objects in contact) increases, so a force is required in order to do the work of compression. That's the contact force that we experience."

What is the reason for the potential energy increasing?(I know it ultimately is the EM force, but why do electrons interact like that when they come very close?)
 
  • #6
eightsquare,

It is not correct to attribute repulsive interatomic forces to electronic effects. For example, the forces between two atoms are due to energy changes in the entire two-atom system. The dominant contribution is the repulsive interaction between the two nuclei. I will work through a simple example to demonstrate this - two hydrogen atoms approaching.

I make use of the following ionization potential data:

H #1: 13.6 eV (H+)
He #1: 24.6 eV (He+); #2: 54.4 eV (He2+).

Consider the situation when two H atoms are far apart. The nuclei do not interact significantly with each other, nor do the electrons, due to their large separation. The energy stored up in the electron-nuclear interactions is the same for each atom, or in total = -2*13.6 = -27.2 eV. This is the system energy at large internuclear separations.

Now bring the nuclei quite close together. Two things happen: (a) the Coulombic potential energy due to nuclear repulsion becomes significant; (b) the energy stored up in electron-nuclear interactions changes, since each electron can now interact with both nuclei; (c) there are also repulsive interactions between electrons.

For very small internuclear separations (R), the contribution from (a) goes up towards +infinity, while the contribution from (b) and (c) approaches a limiting value, which we can easily calculate: note that as R tends to zero, the system transforms into a helium atom (that is, a neutral atom with a +2 nuclear charge). So, the limiting value of (b) + (c) can be deduced from the sum of first and second ionization energies for He, or -79 eV.

From this, one can see that the energy associated with electronic effects does fall by up to 51.8 eV [i.e. from -27.2 to -79.0] as the nuclei approach. However, it is not difficult to see that this is overwhelmed by the repulsive internuclear interaction which rises much more rapidly.

At intermediate distances the overall interaction results in a negative energy change relative to large separations, so H atoms can form a stable molecule.

So, to sum up, the repulsive forces between atoms are mainly due to nuclear repulsion, which at small R is not counterbalanced by the more attractive electronic contributions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #7
gadong said:
eightsquare,

Now bring the nuclei quite close together. Two things happen: (a) the Coulombic potential energy due to nuclear repulsion becomes significant; (b) the energy stored up in electron-nuclear interactions changes, since each electron can now interact with both nuclei; (c) there are also repulsive interactions between electrons.

For very small internuclear separations (R), the contribution from (a) goes up towards +infinity, while the contribution from (b) and (c) approaches a limiting value, which we can easily calculate: note that as R tends to zero, the system transforms into a helium atom (that is, a neutral atom with a +2 nuclear charge). So, the limiting value of (b) + (c) can be deduced from the sum of first and second ionization energies for He, or -79 eV.

So, to sum up, the repulsive forces between atoms are mainly due to nuclear repulsion, which at small R is not counterbalanced by the more attractive electronic contributions.

Great explanation! I always wondered how how this can happen as I took the electron orbits to be kind of like walls which cannot be passed so I took that the nuclei cannot come closer than r1+r2.
 

1. What is the Pauli Exclusion Principle?

The Pauli Exclusion Principle is a fundamental law of quantum mechanics that states that no two identical fermions (particles with half-integer spin) can occupy the same quantum state simultaneously. This principle helps to explain the behavior of electrons in atoms and is crucial for understanding the stability of matter.

2. Who discovered the Pauli Exclusion Principle?

The Pauli Exclusion Principle was first proposed by the Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli in 1925. It was later confirmed by experiments conducted by Enrico Fermi and others.

3. How does the Pauli Exclusion Principle apply to electrons?

The Pauli Exclusion Principle applies to electrons as they are fermions with half-integer spin. This means that in an atom, no two electrons can have the same set of quantum numbers (such as energy level, orbital, and spin) and therefore occupy the same quantum state. This principle also explains the structure of the periodic table and the number of electrons that can occupy each energy level.

4. What are some real-world applications of the Pauli Exclusion Principle?

The Pauli Exclusion Principle has many important applications in fields such as chemistry, materials science, and astrophysics. It is used to explain the stability of matter, the behavior of electrons in atoms, and the properties of different materials. It also plays a crucial role in understanding the structure and evolution of stars.

5. Is the Pauli Exclusion Principle a universal law?

Yes, the Pauli Exclusion Principle is a universal law that applies to all fermions, including electrons, protons, neutrons, and many other subatomic particles. It is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics and has been extensively tested and confirmed through experiments.

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
703
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
941
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
717
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
939
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
974
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top