Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Pay China to not burn coal

  1. Feb 15, 2008 #1

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Fareed Zakaria, the former host of Foreign Exchange, on PBS, made about the silliest statement that I've ever heard from a PBS news show host [maybe this is why he recently stopped hosting the show - he got canned as a kook]. He argues that if we don't pay China to not burn coal, they will burn coal, so we should pay them.

    David Gergen rolled his eyes and asked how it would go over with the US auto workers if we can fund China, but not them. I, on the other hand, nearly choked to death on my coffee.

    But the heart of his point is valid. What good does it do for the US and the rest of the world to reduce CO2 emissions when China is building a new coal power plant every two weeks? Does China intend to be the world's environmental tyrant?

    All products imported from China should be taxed severely for environmental damages.
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 15, 2008 #2

    BobG

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hence, the crux of the problem.

    The Earth can't take the abuse of having every country in the world live like Americans.

    On the other hand, is it fair to tell China that it's people have to live a third world life style? China is improving the economic well being of its people the cheapest way it knows how.

    In fact, I think that's why the environment was included in that show as one of the toughest challenges facing the next President. There isn't a very good or fair solution.
     
  4. Feb 15, 2008 #3

    Will we be borrowing the money from China, to pay China?
     
  5. Feb 15, 2008 #4

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    So it would seem. :biggrin: Maybe it would make more sense to spend that money on energy independence so that we can reduce the trade deficit by 60%.

    Given that China steals everything anyway, let's give them something good to steal.
     
  6. Feb 15, 2008 #5

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I understand that they are trying to climb out of a hole. But there has to be incentive for change, and not by simply giving them money borrowed from them.

    Our trade policy is the biggest suckers game I've ever seen! Unless we all play by the same rules [environment, labor, quality controls, etc] it is not a free [competitive] market. So the only way to compensate and provide incentives for change is to tax imports based on the disparities between the US manufacturing base, and that of the country of origin for a given product.
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2008
  7. Feb 15, 2008 #6

    lisab

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    How can I get in on this? I'll not burn coal, if someone pays me not to.
     
  8. Feb 15, 2008 #7
    Yeah, that's dumb. It's not like China reviewed a bunch of different energy options and chose coal. It's more complex than that. They're building all of the nuclear power plants and buying all the uranium from Australia they possibly can already. A major reason why coal is used so much is that it's often the only energy resource that can be acquired nearby and delivered practically (i.e. with giant dump trucks) especially in many of the more outlying provinces. We'd have to do more than simply pay them a little more to do something else, we'd have to build them an entire energy distribution infrastructure for whatever we want them to use. Like a natural gas pipeline system, for example (not to mention new natural-gas-fired power plants.
     
  9. Feb 15, 2008 #8

    Art

    User Avatar

    Funny but true - China are accidentally reducing their CO2 emissions through power outages.

    To manage inflation the Chinese gov't imposed price controls on diesel and as the price of oil rose the gov't mandated selling price was lower than the purchase price of raw oil and so not surprisingly the fuel suppliers refused to sell fuel so the trucks which carry the coal to the power plants couldn't run leading to shortages of coal at the power plants which in turn led to power cuts and higher prices for electricity. To fix this the gov't set a fixed price for electricity and as this didn't cover the cost of the now far more expensive coal the power plants wouldn't buy coal to produce power at a loss leading to more power cuts.

    Well at least no-one can question the Chinese govt's commitment to CO2 reduction albeit in a somewhat circuitous fashion. :biggrin:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/24/b...75690f5b2f3c5e&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
     
  10. Feb 16, 2008 #9
    China is payed regardless of whether they burn coal or not. The incentive however upon payment is to not burn coal and instead purchase alternatives like oil.
     
  11. Feb 16, 2008 #10
    A couple of years back, I built a couple combustion analyzers for Chinese coal. The stuff is fairly low BTU with lots of ?? in it, so they are apt to make more pollution than a typical American coal-fired power plant. Probably the best answer now is to support the heck out of their nuclear program.
     
  12. Feb 16, 2008 #11

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    There is a precedent for this in the way CFCs were phased-out. China, like with CFCs, gets the benefit of hindsight and technology that the rest of the world didn't have when they industrialized. That's not an insignificant advantage - which should bring with it some responsibility.

    Yes, it will slow their development, but it will help even them in the long run by avoiding the environmental devistation they are currently racing toward. Whether China follows it or not, today's world lives on a principle of individual rights, not the utilitarian principle. With the quantity of pollution they are putting out, China is currently raising up some at the expense of others even in their own country. And frankly, that's a bigger issue - their government makes it so that while some people get power, others get black snow. But there is much more to it than that. The overall problem is that their government is preventing development as much as they are facilitating it.
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2008
  13. Feb 16, 2008 #12

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Go buy yourself a bunch of land, then get the government to pay you not to grow crops on it. Same diff.
     
  14. Feb 16, 2008 #13

    Moonbear

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Can I get paid not to grow crops on the land, and not to mine coal under the ground, and not to burn that coal that might somehow leap out of the ground? If so, I have a whole state full of people here who might be interested in whatever they're offering.
     
  15. Feb 17, 2008 #14

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    For once Russ and I are 100% in agreement. That alone should scare the hell out of China! :biggrin:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Pay China to not burn coal
  1. Army Pay (Replies: 17)

  2. U.S. & China (Replies: 11)

  3. Facebook in China (Replies: 20)

  4. China with Drones? (Replies: 48)

Loading...