For those of you who have read the theorem, probably have also read Matt Leifer's review of it. In his review he says that the only way to remain psi epistemic is to be an anti realist(copenhagen), or to abandon the bell frame work. Is it viable to be psi epistemic but still believe that particles and atoms are real?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# PBR theorem

Tags:

Loading...

Similar Threads - theorem | Date |
---|---|

I Bell's Theorem and Reality | Feb 13, 2018 |

A Time independence of a Noether charge in QFT? | Feb 10, 2018 |

A Probability of obtaining general quantum measurement outcome | Feb 5, 2018 |

A Fundamental Theorem of Quantum Measurements | Jan 24, 2018 |

I Is Bell's Theorem correct? | Jan 21, 2018 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**