Perhaps gravity is not space-time curvative, and background independence not needed, and spacetime is infinitely divisible.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

What's the difference between stating that gravity is a manifestation of local spacetime geometry, and

gravity is a particle field of gravitons, moving across an eternal, timeless, shapeless, non-dynamic, inert minkowski type background, that interacts with everything, including matter and energy, in a curved-path manner? time dilation is the result of gravity fields interacting with fermions/bosons, not curved spacetime.

how do we know that spacetime geometry is dynamical independent of its effects on fermions and bosons? perhaps gravitational lensing is not the result of curvative but gravity-particles.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Perhaps gravity is not space-time curvative, and spacetime is nondynamical

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Perhaps gravity space | Date |
---|---|

A When does the Minkowski metric get non-zero off-diagonals? | Monday at 8:49 AM |

B If gravity is an effect of curved spacetime, why gravitons? | Apr 9, 2018 |

B Flat spacetime in a gravity well | Mar 31, 2018 |

B Gravity and Acceleration | Mar 7, 2018 |

Testing General Relativity, and perhaps Quantum Gravity | Mar 28, 2004 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**