1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Perpendicular component notation

  1. Mar 13, 2007 #1
    If I have [tex]e^{i \mathbf{q_\perp \cdot x}}[/tex] what does it mean?Specifically what does the [tex]\mathbf{q_\perp}[/tex] mean?

  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 13, 2007 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    It usually means the perpendicular component of q relative to something.
  4. Mar 13, 2007 #3
    Yes that's what I thought. Relative to what though?

    Surely it can't mean relative to x because the dot product would imply that the term always = 0 right?
  5. Mar 13, 2007 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    How could I guess 'relative to what'? I'd agree it's probably not x.
  6. Mar 13, 2007 #5
    The equation I'm dealing with which contains this term is

    [tex]\epsilon(\mathbf{r})=\frac{i}{q_z} \int d^2 \mathbf{x} e^{i \mathbf{q_\bot \cdot x}}[\epsilon_2 e^{iq_z[H+h_2(\mathbf{x})]} - \epsilon_1 e^{iq_z h_1(\mathbf{x})}][/tex]

    I guess it could be perpendicular to r... but what difference would that make? What would it mean?
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2007
  7. Mar 14, 2007 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    It's probably perpendicular to the magnetic field intensity vector H.
  8. Mar 14, 2007 #7
    ahh see the H actually stands for height in this equation. :P h_x is a length also and purely a function of x.

    But hmm perpendicular to H you say... that actually makes a lot more sense to me than any of the other variables if H were a vector, unfortunately its a mean separation, so that couldn't be it could it? I mean H is measured in a particular direction but... can you use that perpendicular symbol relative to something that's not a vector but measured in a particular dimension?

  9. Mar 14, 2007 #8
    well thinking about it this is a 2 D problem using a radial or cartesian coordinate system. The radial dimensions are expressed by r and the cartesian dimensions are expressed by x= x_x + x_z.

    Saying that we are dealing with something perpendicular to r makes no sense to me in the context of the system to be honest. Since it has cartesian symmetry but no radial symmetry. Although I could be missing somthing since the equation comes from a fourier tranformation which I don't actually understand...

    (a fourier transform of the system

    [tex]\epsilon(i f, r) = \epsilon_2(i f)[/tex] when [tex]H + h_2(x) \leq z < + \infty[/tex]
    [tex]\epsilon(i f, r) = 0[/tex] when [tex]h_1(x) < z < H + h_2(x)[/tex]
    [tex]\epsilon(i f, r) = \epsilon_1(i f)[/tex] when [tex]- \infty < z \leq h_1(x)[/tex]


    Saying its perpendicular to x is pointless. So I'm inclined to believe its either perpendicular to x_x or x_z. But which I don't know... :/ Nah actually though I bet if I actually understood the fourier transform I'd understand what that q is perpendicular to :/ Can anyone help please? :(
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2007
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?