- #1

- 16

- 0

**Straight Aristocracy**

Due to inertia objects always move or remain stationary until put into motion or to a stop by an external force, and when put into motion movement always wants to to be in a perpendicular (straight) line.

If the latter part of this is true it postulates that if an object which was put into motion by an unknown entity in zero gravity is moving in a circle a force must be acting upon it. Hence, no object will inertially move in a circle unless it is a spin (rotation on its' axis). And therefore, all movement in this universe (straight, circular, diagonal; everything) is just a configuration of perpendicular forces with differing magnitudes acting on differing points on a body.

Experimentally it seems as if this is backed up. If you take a string, a iron square with a hole in the center, tie the string to the hole and then spin the string its' circular movement is actually the iron mass attempting to find a why out so it can move in a straight line (e.g when you let go it moves straight. It doesn't continue the circle till its' energy runs out). I have a question that concerns how much energy would be lost by balls (spheres) moving in a circular pipe. Let me use these examples to help clarify:

(1) If you take two balls, launch them at the same speed, with one going to a 3 meter long straight pipe (hollow cylinder) and the other in a 3 meter long circular pipe (notice same length) which one would win and why or would it be a tie?

Wouldn't the the ball going through the circle lose more energy due to the balls constant attempt to break the circle?

(2) Now let's say a vehicle with a curb weight of 3000LB is moving at 80MPH and the driver suddenly turns the wheels as far as possible. The car will skid because it wants to continue its perpendicular habit. But if your going the same speed and turn the wheels only slightly it will not skid because the circle isn't as circular and hence, it takes less energy to turn correct?

(3) Finally, consider a spiral of a hollow cylinder in which from the initial start the subsequent circles continue to shrink as they go down. If you throw a ball through it will the ball slow down as it gets closer to the center as the circles continue to shrink?

**Conclusion:**

If it does take more energy to move a ball through a smaller circle is the energy lose considerable? Or is it small enough to be ignored? Maybe I have a completely wrong idea? I was just wondering about this circular phenomenon so if you have an answer please reply!

Last edited: