Persistence of myths

  1. Apparently, this WP article says that trying to debunk a myth might actually end up reinforcing the myth via repetition.

    "Myth-busters, in other words, have the odds against them."

    I wonders, how do we debunk a myth without actually repeating the myth itself in the process?
  2. jcsd
  3. NateTG

    NateTG 2,514
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    By promulgating the truths that contradict the myth. I'm sure that there is room for science there, but people are going to have an easier time remembering a positive declarative statement than a complicated one. So dependent clauses and negations are bad (unless you're a politician).
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thead via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar discussions for: Persistence of myths