Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Persistence of vision

  1. Jan 1, 2005 #1
    I know it is used to refer to the property of brain/eye that it takes them one-tenth of a second to process a new image after processing one but I just cant figure out how does a movie camera takes advantage of it and fool our brain so that it thinks that its waching a smooth motion though i know that most of them change 24 images a second. I've tried google but coundnt find anything convincing.
    Thanks in advance for any help. :smile:
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 1, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    A film projector flashes images at about 30 frames per sec. So each frame is on the screen for a period of time which is less then the persistence of the eye. Before 1 frame has faded a new one is present. Thus you get the feeling of smooth motion.
  4. Jan 1, 2005 #3


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    This only works well under dark light, with your pupils dialated and your retina getting just enough over-saturation that the persistance increases.

    Under bright light, you can see 60hz flicker on a monitor, but part of this is that the persitance of the monitor is set for faster refresh rates.
  5. Jan 1, 2005 #4
    here is a neat page with a simple explanation and demonstrative animations:

    however, it seems that the persistence of vision 'theory' may not be correct at all according to research done in the 1980s and that it is really a psychological phenomenon. here is a rather interesting (and surprising - to me at any rate) article on that matter:

    it has in fact long been determined that the so-called 'persistence of vision' is also probably irrelevant to the effect of (1), a continuous, flickerless image.
    PERSISTENCE OF VISION by Stephen Herbert
    http://www.grand-illusions.com/percept.htm [Broken]

    it would seem that the commonly propagated explanation of illusion, may itself be an illusion!
    Last edited by a moderator: May 1, 2017
  6. Jan 2, 2005 #5
    Given that the brain takes at least 50mS to process data and somtimes never it's hardly surprising that persistence should be more complex than retina saturation , it is often the case that what you remember is totally different from reallity --- so I guess you can say that everbodies movie is probably different antway.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook