Again, I am having difficulty deciphering my class notes - in this case there are missing lines of explanation. If we consider a system of particles that approach and interact, the Heisenberg representation of the interacting field is:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\phi(\vec{x} , t) = U^{-1} (t) \phi_{a} (\vec{x} , t) U(t)[/tex]

(where [tex]\phi_a[/tex] is the free field before the interaction.

Why is it that we can write:

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \phi_{a}= \frac{\partial}{\partial t} U \phi U^{-1}=[\frac{\partial}{\partial t} UU^{-1},\phi_{a}]+iU[H,\phi]U^{-1} [/tex]

where the square brackets in the third equality are commutators?

I don't understand where the third expression comes from?

Thanks.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Pertubation Theory

Loading...

Similar Threads - Pertubation Theory | Date |
---|---|

I Wavefunctions in first order degenerate pertubation theory | Jan 6, 2018 |

Time dependent pertubation theory | Oct 17, 2012 |

1st order pertubation on 2 level system | Nov 27, 2011 |

Pertubation theory | Apr 15, 2011 |

Degenerate pertubation theory when the first order fails | Jan 11, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**