Peskin and Schroeder page 38

  • #1
1,344
30

Main Question or Discussion Point

In page 39, Peskin and Schroeder write that (3.15) ##{\bf{J}}={\bf{x}} \times{\bf{p}}= {\bf{x}}\times(-i \nabla) ## can be used to derive the Lorentz algebra (3.12) for the rotation group: ##[J^{i},J^{j}] = i \epsilon^{ijk}J^{k}##.

I am trying to prove it. Here's my attempt. Can you please suggest the next steps?

##[J^{i},J^{j}] = J^{i}J^{j} - J^{j}J^{i} = (\epsilon^{ijk}x^{j}\nabla^{k})(\epsilon^{jki}x^{k}\nabla^{i}) - (\epsilon^{jki}x^{k}\nabla^{i})(\epsilon^{ijk}x^{j}\nabla^{k})##.

Where do I go from here?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
13,815
5,626
Just put a scalar wave function to the right of the expression and do the differentiation. Then use
$$\epsilon^{jkl} \epsilon^{jmn}=\delta^{km} \delta^{ln}-\delta^{kn} \delta^{lm}$$
and further contractions. It's a bit lengthy but not diffcult.
 
  • #3
1,344
30
Thanks for the reply.

I'm just not really sure if my choices of indices in ##(\epsilon^{ijk}x^{j}\nabla^{k})(\epsilon^{jki}x^{k}\nabla^{i}) - (\epsilon^{jki}x^{k}\nabla^{i})(\epsilon^{ijk}x^{j}\nabla^{k})## is sound. I mean, I used the same indices for ##J^{i}## and ##J^{j}##'s expanded expressions.

Should I rather do the following?

##[J^{i},J^{j}] = J^{i}J^{j} - J^{j}J^{i} = (\epsilon^{ikl}x^{k}\nabla^{l})(\epsilon^{jmn}x^{m}\nabla^{n}) - (\epsilon^{jmn}x^{m}\nabla^{n})(\epsilon^{ikl}x^{k}\nabla^{l})##.
 

Related Threads for: Peskin and Schroeder page 38

Replies
2
Views
738
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
637
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
903
Top