I don't quite get the argument peskin used to obtain equation(6.46), page 191:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\int{\frac{d^{4}l}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{l^{\mu}l^{\nu}}{D^3}}=\int{\frac{d^{4}l}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{\frac{1}{4}g^{\mu\nu}l^2}{D^3}}[/tex]

He said"The integral vanishes by symmetry unless [itex]\mu=\nu[/itex]. Lorentz invariance therefore requires that we get something proportional to [itex]g^{\mu\nu}[/itex]......".

I don't understand the "Lorentz invariance therefore....." part. How can one deduce from Lorentz invariance that LHS is an invariant tensor?

I can convince myself the result by arguing spherical symmetry of the integrand, but I just want to understand Peskin's reasoning.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Peskin equation (6.46)

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Peskin equation | Date |
---|---|

Peskin and Schroeder - Derivation of equation (2.45) | Oct 20, 2015 |

Factor in equation (3.49) of Peskin and Schroeder | Apr 27, 2012 |

Peskin equation (7.51) | Jan 3, 2012 |

Meaning of Peskin equation (7.25) | Dec 28, 2011 |

Peskin Schroeder Enigmatic Equation | Feb 15, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**