I don't quite get the argument peskin used to obtain equation(6.46), page 191:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\int{\frac{d^{4}l}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{l^{\mu}l^{\nu}}{D^3}}=\int{\frac{d^{4}l}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{\frac{1}{4}g^{\mu\nu}l^2}{D^3}}[/tex]

He said"The integral vanishes by symmetry unless [itex]\mu=\nu[/itex]. Lorentz invariance therefore requires that we get something proportional to [itex]g^{\mu\nu}[/itex]......".

I don't understand the "Lorentz invariance therefore....." part. How can one deduce from Lorentz invariance that LHS is an invariant tensor?

I can convince myself the result by arguing spherical symmetry of the integrand, but I just want to understand Peskin's reasoning.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Peskin equation (6.46)

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**