- #316
- 2,111
- 2,691
Yes.Greg Bernhardt said:When you click the CDN link, you see a image with the "thumbs down" icon?
Yes.Greg Bernhardt said:When you click the CDN link, you see a image with the "thumbs down" icon?
When I click the link then I use the browser as image viewer, and all is as described: correct in chrome (W10), wrong in Opera. I wanted to test the file itself.Greg Bernhardt said:When you click the CDN link, you see a image with the "thumbs down" icon?
The various browsers. They interpret the code line by line, or meanwhile tag by tag, in contrast to a program which needs a compiled code and executes the compilation.What is an interpreter?
Just out of curiosity, where was the issue?Greg Bernhardt said:I know the issue, should be fixed now
I upgraded PFs core software a few days ago, it overwrote the custom reaction image.Wrichik Basu said:Just out of curiosity, where was the issue?
I'm hiding everywhere.fresh_42 said:The bad news is, it shows "Tom G" as the one who set the mark, not me.
I get the same thing. No "about" and a link to start a conversationTom.G said:When viewing a particular members Information page, clicking on the "About" button brings up the "Conversation" window, not the About window.
This does not occur with all members. It does occur here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/members/kenny1999.209603/#about
Yes, since there is no About information entered and the conversation button is always there.phinds said:I get the same thing. No "about" and a link to start a conversation
Ah ha.fresh_42 said:Yes, since there is no About information entered and the conversation button is always there.
OKaay... try this logically similar situtation.fresh_42 said:Yes, since there is no About information entered and the conversation button is always there.
I don't understand this comparison. The About button does what it does with every user. Some have disclosed personal information, other have not. Thus it is empty. At the bottom of the About page is always the "Start Conversation" option. Well, not always. I couldn't start a conversation with myself.Tom.G said:OKaay... try this logically similar situtation.
ThreeFour push buttons on a panel, labelled Up, Down, Pause, Fire.
You push the Pause button.
The Pause function is not implemented.
What random function should be activated?
Odd, I don't seem to have that option. . . always thought it was there ?fresh_42 said:At the bottom of the About page is always the "Start Conversation" option.
It is now above the "About" button, on the same row as the "Find" button. It does not appear when you look at your own account.OCR said:Odd, I don't seem to have that option. . . always thought it was there ?
Not even in the Quantum Physics Forum ?. . . I'm devastated ! .Tom.G said:It does not appear when you look at your own account.
That occurs here ONLY when the About field is empty. It does not appear if the member has filled in the About page.fresh_42 said:At the bottom of the About page is always the "Start Conversation" option.
I was trying to say that the optimal behaviour when selecting an operation is to receive an informative result, not a random result if there is a problem.fresh_42 said:I don't understand this comparison.
Yes, a real problem with Multiple Personality syndrome.OCR said:Not even in the Quantum Physics Forum ?. . . I'm devastated !
Even in the Quantum Physics Forum ? . . . .Tom.G said:. . . is to receive an informative result not a random result. . .
I would hazard an "Indeterminate", at least until the cat is out of theOCR said:Even in the Quantum Physics Forum ? . . . .
It does - below the information the user put in. See OCR's profile for example.Tom.G said:That occurs here ONLY when the About field is empty. It does not appear if the member has filled in the About page.
Hmm, either we are talking about different things/positions or it is computer dependent.mfb said:It does - below the information the user put in. See OCR's profile for example.
And another one, the full view, the one I see, anyway. . . .mfb said:Here is a screenshot.
You sure ?mfb said:Looks like OCR has conversations disabled. . .
That is because the user has set no "About", i.e. none of the fields in the about section for that user is filled.Tom.G said:When viewing a particular members Information page, clicking on the "About" button brings up the "Conversation" window, not the About window.
This does not occur with all members. It does occur here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/members/kenny1999.209603/#about
What do you mean "without special permissions"? Using a few test accounts, I always had the option.mfb said:@Greg Bernhardt: What is going on here? Why is the conversation start link in the profile for some users but not for all - without special permissions?
Check the bottom of OCR's "about" tab in the profile with a test account. There won't be a "Start a conversation" link (or any contact information). For you and for @kenny1999 there is. Where does the difference come from?Greg Bernhardt said:What do you mean "without special permissions"? Using a few test accounts, I always had the option.
Is there some minimum amount of posts required before a new user is allowed to send private messages? I seem to remember a restriction on new members sending private messages after some users were getting spam from new accounts. If your test account is new, this may be the source of the problem.mfb said:Check the bottom of OCR's "about" tab in the profile with a test account. There won't be a "Start a conversation" link (or any contact information). For you and for @kenny1999 there is. Where does the difference come from?
PF5 stands for "Problems & Errors: Report & Discuss" and it is a process used in scientific research to identify and address issues that may arise during experiments or data analysis. It is important to report and discuss these problems and errors in order to maintain the integrity and accuracy of scientific findings.
Some common problems and errors that may occur in scientific research include equipment malfunctions, human error, biased data, and insufficient sample sizes. These can lead to inaccurate results and conclusions if not addressed and corrected.
By reporting and discussing problems and errors, scientists can identify and correct any issues that may affect the accuracy of their research. This can lead to more reliable and valid results, ultimately improving the overall quality of scientific research.
The process for reporting and discussing problems and errors may vary depending on the specific research project and team. However, it typically involves documenting the issue, discussing it with other researchers or colleagues, and implementing a solution or making necessary adjustments to the research methods.
There are several steps scientists can take to prevent problems and errors from occurring in their research. These include carefully planning and designing experiments, using reliable and calibrated equipment, double-checking data and calculations, and having a thorough understanding of the scientific methods being used.