1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Phase transition of a rubber band model

  1. Sep 27, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    In class we studied a phase transition in a model of a rubber band. For small applied tensions, [itex]f < f^*[/itex], the Helmholtz free energy of the band as a function of the length is [itex]A_1(L) = (\kappa_1 /2)L^2[/itex], while at large applied tensions, [itex] f > f^*[/itex], it is [itex]A_2(L) = (\kappa_2 /2)L^2 + a[/itex]. The tension at which the two states coexist was given by [itex]f^* = \left (2 a \Delta \kappa \right)^\frac{1}{2}, \Delta \kappa \equiv 1/\kappa_2 - 1/\kappa_1[/itex]. This analysis assumes that length and tension are controlled.

    Now I have to consider an example where the net length of the system is [itex]L_{total} = L + x[/itex]. The net free energy is given by
    [tex]A_i(L) + (k/2)x^2, i = 1 or 2[/tex]

    where [itex]i[/itex] refers to the subsystem with variable [itex]L[/itex], called the primary subsystem. The secondary subsystem is that with variable [itex]x[/itex].

    I wish to determine the net equilibrium free energy and equilibrium value of [itex]L[/itex] for a fixed value of [itex]L_{total}[/itex].


    2. Relevant equations




    3. The attempt at a solution

    For the simple rubber band model, we determined the equilibrium free energy by defining a Legendre transform
    [tex]\mathcal{G}_i(L_{total}; f) = A_i(L) + (k/2) x^2 - fL_{total}[/tex]
    and finding the minimum value of this by differentiating with respect to the length, setting the derivative to 0 and then evaluating the Legendre transform at this equilibrium length.

    I attempted to do the same thing for this problem, and got as far as:
    [tex]\left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{G}_i}{\partial L_{total}} \right)_f = \left[ \kappa_i L_{eq,i} - k \left( L_{total,eq,i} - L_{eq,i} \right) \right] \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial L_{total}} \right)_f - f = 0[/tex]

    I am not sure what to do at this point. How could I go about using that equation to find the minimum of [itex]\mathcal{G}_i[/itex]?

    Thanks!
     
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2010
  2. jcsd
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted