So we all learn in E&M and Optics courses that light is an EM wave. We play with simple models of light in which we treat a beam as a single frequency sine wave occupying the entire space. This of course is wrong since all physical signals have finite support (they are non-zero only on a finite interval) and are thus more accurately called wave packets. Anyhow, any wave packet(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); canbe turned into a superposition of sine waves over some distribution of frequencies each of which has a well defined phase velocities. So now comes a sequence of questions:

1) Are the component waves physical? Does each of these sine waves have an interpretation in terms of solely photons?

-If YES:

What is the relation between the EM wavesphase velocityand the properties of the photons (can EM phase velocity be derived from the photons wave function)?

-If NO:

What is the correct way of decomposing a signal into its physical constituents (photons)? Using this method, can we determine how many photons are in a signal? What does the signal of a single photon look like?

2) Reverse question: If we have a whole ensemble of photons, and we measure it classically as a signal, what would it look like? Assume that we know the states of each photon, and if necessary assume that they are propagating in the same direction.

Its a lot of questions and a tall order, but the reason I ask this is because I want to see the connection between quantum and classical optics. Phase velocity is such an important thing in classical optics that I figure that its crucial that I grasp this concept. Thanks in advance guys!

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Phase velocities and photons

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**