PhD project on BSM

  • A
  • Thread starter Ramtin123
  • Start date
  • #1
19
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hi,

I have just started a PhD on Beyond SM physics. I had a chat with my supervisor, and he told me to look around to find out what sort of topics interest me.

Is there any good idea about a good PhD topic on BSM?

I appreciate any ideas...
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
489
188
Well what interests you?
Strings, loops, something else?
Phenomenology, cosmology, ...?

You have to narrow it down and check out some reviews on whatever interests you.
 
  • #3
19
0
Thanks JorisL, I need to clarify it a bit more...

I cannot consider topics on string or quantum gravity as my supervisor is not a specialist in these areas.
I have no interest in a purely phenomenological project...
I am personally very interested in applications of BSM in cosmology...

Again any good ideas appreciated...
 
  • #4
489
188
What is his area of expertise? Can you look up topics of previous PhDs he supervised?
 
  • #5
19
0
He is on the borderline between a theoretical physicist and a phenomenologist, and works on the perturbative BSM (not string, QG, …)

He had another PhD student who worked on “scale invariant Lagrangians”, but he believes there is not much work to do on this topic anymore…

He suggested me to work on “diphoton coupling” but this is not even experimentally confirmed, and he agreed that it was a bit early to work on this topic…

So he suggested me to look around and find some other topics that interest me…
 
  • #7
strangerep
Science Advisor
3,061
884
@Ramtin123 : I'd suggest you try not to select a topic that's too far from your supervisor's immediate interests. Ideally, a potential supervisor should offer a (written) list of questions to which he'd like to know the answers, rather than broad topics. I also hope you discuss things with more than one potential supervisor.

I made the mistake twice(!) of youthfully venturing too far from my supervisors' immediate interests, and twice it didn't end well. :headbang: :oldcry:
 
  • #9
19
0
@Ramtin123 : I'd suggest you try not to select a topic that's too far from your supervisor's immediate interests. Ideally, a potential supervisor should offer a (written) list of questions to which he'd like to know the answers, rather than broad topics. I also hope you discuss things with more than one potential supervisor.

I made the mistake twice(!) of youthfully venturing too far from my supervisors' immediate interests, and twice it didn't end well. :headbang: :oldcry:
Thanks @strangerep. I agree... it is a better idea to think about questions rather than broad topics...
I am talking to other faculties as well, but unfortunately my choices are very limited here...
 
  • #10
bapowell
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,243
259
A huge part of getting a PhD and maturing as an independent researcher is to develop this skill on your own. It's challenging, but learning how to identify the interesting questions is greatly rewarding, and necessary if you hope to survive on your own after you graduate. Asking people for research topics is easy but not helpful.
 
  • #11
19
0
A huge part of getting a PhD and maturing as an independent researcher is to develop this skill on your own. It's challenging, but learning how to identify the interesting questions is greatly rewarding, and necessary if you hope to survive on your own after you graduate. Asking people for research topics is easy but not helpful.
Well, I don't like this comment. Please read the question and previous comments before commenting...
Defining a suitable topic for a PhD is the responsibility of the supervisor; but it will be very helpful if other experts can give any ideas about a potential PhD project topic, as I cannot reach to any good agreement with my supervisor.
 
  • #12
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2019 Award
24,017
6,572
Well, I don't like this comment.
Pity, because it was spot on.
 
  • #13
strangerep
Science Advisor
3,061
884
A huge part of getting a PhD and maturing as an independent researcher is to develop this skill on your own. It's challenging, but learning how to identify the interesting questions is greatly rewarding, and necessary if you hope to survive on your own after you graduate. Asking people for research topics is easy but not helpful.
Tbh, I too am surprised by this remark. A student beginning a PhD is, by definition, not "mature as an independent researcher".

Your 2nd sentence is probably true only after one completes a PhD (though it can sometimes take longer).

If a beginning PhD student is not allowed to ask others for advice about topics, then wtf is the supervisor for? :oldconfused:
 
  • #14
bapowell
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,243
259
Tbh, I too am surprised by this remark. A student beginning a PhD is, by definition, not "mature as an independent researcher".
You misquoted me. The "ing" at the end of the word "mature" is kind of important. Being handed a project by an advisor or anyone else is not constructive in my experience.
 
  • #15
atyy
Science Advisor
13,727
1,853
You misquoted me. The "ing" at the end of the word "mature" is kind of important. Being handed a project by an advisor or anyone else is not constructive in my experience.
But maybe at least a pointer in some broad direction?

Here's an interesting anecdote http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.1855
"7. KGW: I met with Murray Gell-Mann to get a thesis problem, and he suggested a problem. And I thought there was no way I was working on that. So he had to come up with another one, and it didn't take him very long. The thing that impresses me most about Murray Gell-Mann when I think back on it, is how quickly he got things done. I have never met anybody who could do things as fast as he could. And so it didn't take him very long to come up with another problem for me to work on. And so he asked me to think about an equation, which was called the Gell-Mann-Low equation, and it was an equation which was of interest to him for what he would call low energy phenomena. The first thing I did with that equation was study it in the limit of high energies, the exact opposite limit to anything he was interested in. As I said, it was a small problem, but it led over ten years to larger and larger problems and to some of the key publications, in fact including the publication that was cited for the Nobel prize. But I did it by working my way from small to large, not from starting at the large from the beginning."
 
  • #16
74
8
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massive_gravity

It´s an interesting topic, since it has interaction with high energy physics, cosmology (both theoretical and observational) and potentially also with beyond the standard model physics.

Hope you find it useful. :D
 
  • #17
MathematicalPhysicist
Gold Member
4,219
172
A huge part of getting a PhD and maturing as an independent researcher is to develop this skill on your own. It's challenging, but learning how to identify the interesting questions is greatly rewarding, and necessary if you hope to survive on your own after you graduate. Asking people for research topics is easy but not helpful.
I don't see the need in a supervisor in that case really.
 
  • #18
bapowell
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,243
259
I don't see the need in a supervisor in that case really.
Really? You see no room for a supervisor short of handing a project to a student? None at all?
 
  • #19
MathematicalPhysicist
Gold Member
4,219
172
If the student is supposed to look for interesting questions by himself then what is the use of the supervisor?

What is the task of the supervisor?

If I am supposed to do all the research by myself and choose the questions that interest me and seem important, what does the supervisor do?

Unless the supervisor knows which problems are important, I don't see what the supervisor can contribute?
 
  • #20
bapowell
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,243
259
The supervisor answers questions, suggests approaches to solutions when the student is having difficulty, gives advice on the viability/promise of a particular research direction, advises the student on career path, advocates for the student within the research community, etc. In my opinion the role of the supervisor is not to say "calculate such and such for your PhD".

Of course, everyone has different experiences and supervisors run the gamut from absentee to over-controlling. Most people, unless they had an awful time during their PhD studies, will believe that their supervisor's involvement was at the appropriate level. The varied opinions in this thread are evidence of that.

But looking at it objectively, I think there is something healthy about spending the first year of a PhD getting to know what's out there, trying to find the unanswered but interesting questions. Sure, the supervisor should give you a ballpark (study inflation, study brane theory, etc) and then the student should begin voraciously digesting papers, talking to others, etc to get acquainted with the field and to stimulate and hone their own interests. I just find it odd for a student to be told by others what interests him.
 
  • #21
strangerep
Science Advisor
3,061
884
You misquoted me. The "ing" at the end of the word "mature" is kind of important.
I don't think that changes the essence of my remark. The maturing would take place during the process of working towards the PhD, not at the very beginning.

Being handed a project by an advisor or anyone else is not constructive in my experience.
Perhaps it depends on the student. Personally, I prefer the approach of being offered some well-articulated questions rather than broad topics or canned narrow projects, since that means the supervisor does at least have a more detailed knowledge of the specific area and it's not just a peripheral interest.
 
Last edited:
  • #22
martinbn
Science Advisor
1,704
473
I had a chat with my supervisor, and he told me to look around to find out what sort of topics interest me.
The way I see it, he didn't ask you to find a specific project to work on, but to figure out which topics are intersting to you. May be after that he will give a problem within that topic or guide you into finding some.
 
  • #23
906
223
What may I ask is phenomenology initially mentioned, is that fancy talk for experimental??

As a research topic I would look at where particles get all collective in their behavior like Bose-Einstein condensates.

Or look for a topic employable outside of academia like making really fast switches.

I think students should go to the supervisor with question topics not the other way around.
 
Last edited:
  • #24
191
1
An overlooked but promising area is the cellular automaton model, where perfect conservation of properties is possible and is hopefully capable of unifying the four forces.
 
  • #25
489
188
What may I ask is phenomenology initially mentioned, is that fancy talk for experimental??
It means one starts to look at specific properties the particles have (roughly). Which masses do they have, which charge and so on.
 

Related Threads on PhD project on BSM

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
35
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
690
Replies
67
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
900
Top