How influential is the media in shaping public opinion?

  • News
  • Thread starter marcus
  • Start date
In summary, the media has been caught plagiarizing and pandering to the right, and this has been going on for a long time.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Arnold just got caught doing the same. Why would any of this shock you?

To me the republican screw job is so obvious that I can only watch while in awe of the foolishness of this country.
 
  • #3
Ivan Seeking said:
To me the republican screw job is so obvious that I can only watch while in awe of the foolishness of this country.
First this was debated under the Gannon Guffaw thread, then under FOX's let's bomb them back to the stone age thread, and now this information. Not only is the media leaning more to the right, and practicing censorship, it is being paid to do it.

If you're wondering why the country isn't alarmed, studies showed that Americans who supported Bush tended to have education levels of high school or less. If people were aware of it, they might understand the lack of ethics, but I doubt they would understand the deeper aspect of how this erodes democracy.
 
  • #4
Well, the article is quite a few pages long there, and I've only read about halfway through, but on page 2 or 3, it mentions this began during the Clinton administration, so it seems you don't get to blame Bush entirely for this one, nor use it as evidence of media leaning to the right. If anything, it's evidence of how lazy our news stations have become that they are essentially resorting to plagiarism in showing pre-packaged videos and claiming it as their own work rather than crediting the source. But, this laziness has been pretty obvious for some time. I can go to the Reuters website and read their stories, then listen to the same pre-packaged story being read on every radio and TV channel I listen to that day (or sometimes there's even a day lag in the news getting out). There is absolutely nothing added, no investigative reporting, nothing that even indicates the media stations have gone about confirming sources; the story is read verbatim, and I never hear credit given anymore "this report just in from the Reuters news wire" or however they used to be credited.

I also don't see it as much worse, other than in not giving credit to the original source, than in writing a story based on a press package handed out to the reporters without the reporters doing any further checking of the facts and information in that press package.
 
  • #5
This has been brought up about forty times on this board alone, and as Moonbear points out, many politicians from both sides are guilty as is just about every news agency out there, regardless of how it leans. The fact that anyone is shocked by this is what shocks me. Has there ever been a time when the news media was truly trustworthy?
 
  • #6
The media has never been entirely trustworthy because they will put whatever spin they can on a story so that it sells newspapers or increases the number of viewers. Its a dangerous combination.

I believe it was Mark Twain who said "Those who don't read the newspapers are uninformed...Those who do read the papers are misinformed."
 

What is "phony media on bush payroll"?

"Phony media on bush payroll" is a phrase used to describe the alleged practice of certain media outlets being paid by the Bush administration to promote their agenda and manipulate public opinion.

Is there any evidence to support this claim?

There have been various claims and allegations made, but no concrete evidence has been presented to prove that the Bush administration has directly paid media outlets to promote their agenda.

Which media outlets are believed to be on the Bush payroll?

There is no definitive list of media outlets that are believed to be on the Bush payroll. However, some critics have pointed to Fox News and conservative radio hosts as being supportive of the Bush administration's policies.

How does the concept of "phony media on bush payroll" affect the public's perception of the media?

The concept of "phony media on bush payroll" can undermine the credibility of the media and create distrust among the public. It can also lead to the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories.

What can be done to address concerns about "phony media on bush payroll"?

It is important for media outlets to maintain ethical standards and remain impartial in their reporting. Additionally, media literacy and critical thinking skills can help individuals discern between biased or false information and credible sources.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
62
Views
22K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
Replies
54
Views
8K
Back
Top