Photographs that changed the world

  • Thread starter jobyts
  • Start date

Answers and Replies

  • #2
It seems many of those are just photos of events that changed the world.

And of the photos which actually had an impact themselves, the descriptions are still of the events that the picture depicts, rather than how the picture affected the public.
 
  • #3
2,193
2
The one of the vulture stalking the starving child is, to me, very shocking.
As for 911, I am so glad that a federal judge ruled that NONE of the falling victims are to be considered suicide.
 
  • #4
575
47
As for 911, I am so glad that a federal judge ruled that NONE of the falling victims are to be considered suicide.
Is that for insurance purposes?

Still suicide by definition, though.
 
  • #5
2,193
2
Is that for insurance purposes?

Still suicide by definition, though.

The judge ruled that, for insurance purposes, "suicide" in that SPECIAL CASE does not fit an acceptable legal definition of suicide.
 
  • #6
575
47
The judge ruled that, for insurance purposes, "suicide" in that SPECIAL CASE does not fit an acceptable legal definition of suicide.

They should do that for all cases that are similar; like people in other burning buildings.
 
  • #7
37
2
It seems many of those are just photos of events that changed the world.

And of the photos which actually had an impact themselves, the descriptions are still of the events that the picture depicts, rather than how the picture affected the public.

Uh, no they are definitely the photographs doing the work. Do you honestly think any of those events would have sent any sort of ripple around the world had they not been known? Oh right they couldn't have because they wouldn't have been known.

Photojournalist study their photographs with the UTMOST attention to detail in order to specific convey meanings and feelings. You are vastly underrating these photographs with the statement you've just made. I bet you wouldn't be able to take and distribute a picture that would be viewed worldwide sparking emotion and thoughts if I gave all the equipment to you and a disaster happened close by.
 
  • #9
Uh, no they are definitely the photographs doing the work. Do you honestly think any of those events would have sent any sort of ripple around the world had they not been known? Oh right they couldn't have because they wouldn't have been known.

Photojournalist study their photographs with the UTMOST attention to detail in order to specific convey meanings and feelings. You are vastly underrating these photographs with the statement you've just made. I bet you wouldn't be able to take and distribute a picture that would be viewed worldwide sparking emotion and thoughts if I gave all the equipment to you and a disaster happened close by.

Thanks, point taken :biggrin: I concede I was quite too unappreciative of the potential of pictures
 
  • #10
37
2
@OP, Indeed many of those pictures are quite disturbing, but something that is MORE disturbing is that many of those images have videos of the same events. It's a pretty uncomfortable feeling watching a seemingly random person be executed or falling to their death.

Here's a photojournalist who has plenty of photos that I've gone through before and thought were 'great':
http://www.zoriah.net/blog/
 
  • #11
Office_Shredder
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,544
582
Some of them are stupid. First picture on the internet?

Overall very touching
 
  • #12
Evo
Mentor
23,193
3,005
Wow, I've only seen 5 of those.

Never seen the first one. Some I saw in Time/Life magazine. The youngest pregnant girl was from a medical journal from 1939, obscure, had nothing to do with anything aside from being shown as a freak picture on the internet. The first picture of the hand, never seen it before, has no meaning either outside of biology.

Ok, so these pictures were a bad choice overall, IMO. There are much more meaningful ones.
 
  • #13
37
2
Wow, I've only seen 5 of those.

Never seen the first one. Some I saw in Time/Life magazine. The youngest pregnant girl was from a medical journal from 1939, obscure, had nothing to do with anything aside from being shown as a freak picture on the internet. The first picture of the hand, never seen it before, has no meaning either outside of biology.

Ok, so these pictures were a bad choice overall, IMO. There are much more meaningful ones.

Uhmm, I'm pretty sure that the pregnant 5 year old was released publicly without the internet? Regardless I don't think the intention of it is a 'freak show'. And the one of the hand... it's not there because it's the first picture of a hand, it's the first x-ray, which is in a way a type of picture. Are you going to tell me that's not a monumental image?
 
  • #14
575
47
So... the father raped the 5 year old girl? I noticed that where the male gamete came from wasn't mentioned. It wasn't immaculate conception.
 
  • #15
37
2
So... the father raped the 5 year old girl? I noticed that where the male gamete came from wasn't mentioned. It wasn't immaculate conception.

No one knows, they believe the father raped her but there wasn't enough evidence so charges were dropped against him. The girl wouldn't say anything about what had happened.

This is one of the odd/disgusting things about this story. Most people when they hear about how young she was and pregnant find it amazing/miracle/interesting that she was only pregnant at such at young age. No one EVER (few exceptions) thinks 'why was someone having sex with a 5 year old?'

It's almost as if people find it acceptable that she got pregnant because of how interesting it is.
 
  • #16
2,425
7
So... the father raped the 5 year old girl? I noticed that where the male gamete came from wasn't mentioned. It wasn't immaculate conception.
The answer is not known, and probably best left that way obviously.
 
  • #17
37
2
The answer is not known, and probably best left that way obviously.

Case and point. lol.

How can anyone think it's probably best that a child rapist of a 5 year old girl goes unknown/uncaught? By my morals and values this is definitely not something I consider.
 
  • #18
167
0
Good post.
 
  • #19
575
47
This is one of the odd/disgusting things about this story. Most people when they hear about how young she was and pregnant find it amazing/miracle/interesting that she was only pregnant at such at young age. No one EVER (few exceptions) thinks 'why was someone having sex with a 5 year old?'

It's almost as if people find it acceptable that she got pregnant because of how interesting it is.
The article makes it sound like having sex with 5 year old kids is given; the only part that needed explaining is how it resulted in pregnancy. "Turns out she was precocious with her menstruation. So yeah, there's the answer to the one question I know you were asking in your head."

It's like if I got E. coli from eating dog poop and the only thing people want to know is why dog poop has E. coli in it; not why I'm eating dog poop in the first place.
 
  • #20
37
2
It's like if I got E. coli from eating dog poop and the only thing people want to know is why dog poop has E. coli in it; not why I'm eating dog poop in the first place.

Lol, precisely.
 
  • #21
lisab
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,887
617
No one knows, they believe the father raped her but there wasn't enough evidence so charges were dropped against him. The girl wouldn't say anything about what had happened.

This is one of the odd/disgusting things about this story. Most people when they hear about how young she was and pregnant find it amazing/miracle/interesting that she was only pregnant at such at young age. No one EVER (few exceptions) thinks 'why was someone having sex with a 5 year old?'

It's almost as if people find it acceptable that she got pregnant because of how interesting it is.

Oh I'm not so sure about this. Any parent would look at that pic and think, Bring the girl's parents in for questioning...NOW. At least that's what I thought....but then, I'm a mom.
 
  • #22
BobG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
185
82
Photographs that changed the world should be the ones where the picture, itself, had a huge impact on the public psyche. Some of those that just document an important moment in history could still be considered a picture that changed the world just because the picture so well captured the public psyche that the picture became a symbol of the event (i.e. - Iwo Jima flag raising and the sailor kissing a random girl on the street).

I think they came up short by at least one picture. The pictures of Abu Ghraib had at least as significant an impact on public opinion as the Napalm girl and execution of the Viet Nam war.
 
  • #23
2,425
7
How can anyone think it's probably best that a child rapist of a 5 year old girl goes unknown/uncaught? By my morals and values this is definitely not something I consider.
If the event were recent, I would completely agree. But after more than 70 years, it would seem the culprit escaped justice. Even the child died by now.
 
  • #24
167
0
I'm glad she seemed to have lived a full life despite this.
 

Related Threads on Photographs that changed the world

  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
J
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
773
  • Last Post
6
Replies
138
Views
18K
Top