Peres, p47 has an thought experiment where:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

1 million linearly polarized photons in the x-direction and another million polarized in the y-direction are placed in a box where they travel in the +- z direction with no change in the polarizations. No record is kept of the order in which they are introduced, only the total numbers are recorded. A second box repeats this but with circularly polarized photons - a million clockwise and a million counter-clockwise. You are given one of the boxes at random and test each photon with a perfect detector. what is the probability of making a wrong guess?

The author lists it as approximately [itex](4\pi * 10^6)^{-1/2}[/itex]

My thinking is that testing for linear vs. circular polarization are non-complementary, pure states so if you get the linear box and set up a test for circular polarization, then you will get a random answer - a 50/50 chance of being either clockwise or counterclockwise. If you test for linear polarization on the linear box with a perfect detector you will recover the original polarization.

So I get the probability of making a wrong guess of which box you received is just smidgen under 50% : the prob of getting the right box less the prob of getting the wrong box and getting a random outcome where exactly 1,000,000 photons are detected in one of the polarized states.

Obviously, I am way off in my thinking - where am I going wrong here?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Photon Polarization

Loading...

Similar Threads - Photon Polarization | Date |
---|---|

I Entanglement and photon polarization | Apr 5, 2017 |

B Has anyone tested a polarization filter sending through photon by photon? | Jan 28, 2017 |

I Use of polarization to experimentally check photon mass? | Jan 15, 2017 |

I What does it mean -- polarization of a single photon? | Nov 24, 2016 |

B Superposition of measurement apparatus | Apr 26, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**