- #1
zonde
Gold Member
- 2,961
- 224
I am puzzled by that statement. I do not intend to question the statement that "photon doesn't admit to define a position observable". My confusion is with the conclusion that photon is less "classical" because it does not have position observable as I can reach only weaker conclusion that photons are different than massive particles. And that includes possibility that photons are more "classical" than massive particles.vanhees71 said:There's no other quantum which is less adequate described as a classical particle than the photon. It doesn't even admit to define a position observable etc. etc. We have discussed this indeed endlessly in this forum.