Physical Chemistry vs. Chemical Physics?

  • Thread starter NewWorldSamurai
  • Start date

NewWorldSamurai

I've yet to clearly understand the difference between these two disciplines, and I was wondering if anyone else had any insights. I first thought they were one and the same, but they are certainly used as different terms in most universities. I've come to understand it as a difference of scales. When one is performing analyses on only a few molecules or atoms, such as electronic or molecular structure calculations and density functional theory calculations, I view that as chemical physics (particularly if quantum mechanics is used). On a more macroscopic scale where one is looking at bulk thermodynamic properties I view that as physical chemistry. Reaction kinetics and statistical thermodynamics are kind of in the middle of these two. That's just my guess though. Any thoughts?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bystander

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
5,117
1,123
A chemical physicist is a physicist first and a bad chemist second; a physical chemist is a chemist first and a lousy physicist second. The scale of problems/sizes of systems being studied/analyzed has very little to do with the distinction --- p-chem is physics from a chemist's viewpoint, and chemphys is chemistry from a physicist's viewpoint. The problems can be identical, the methods can be identical, and the results can be identical, but the interpretations seldom present even a superficial resemblance.
 

NewWorldSamurai

excellent point. i agree totally.
 

Related Threads for: Physical Chemistry vs. Chemical Physics?

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
4
Replies
90
Views
14K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Top