Should I Choose Astrophysics or Aeronautic Engineering for a Physics Career?

In summary, the individual is a freshman who is interested in majoring in physics but is confused about whether to focus on general physics or a specific branch. They are not interested in becoming a professor, but want to do research and earn a good income. They are interested in astrophysics but are also considering aeronautic engineering as a career option. However, it is mentioned that there are limited job opportunities in astrophysics and it does not pay as well as other fields of physics such as optics, condensed matter, and materials science. An aerospace engineering degree may be beneficial for those interested in celestial mechanics, while those interested in star formation may not find it useful.
  • #1
lazer
5
0
I have just completed my freshmen year. I want to do major in physics. I am really confused should I go with general physics or focus in some particular branch of it for a good career?
I do not want to be a professor doing major in physics but want to do some research and also earn good with my degree. I am interested in astrophysics. i am confused which one is better career option astrophysics or aeronautic engineering?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What about astrophysics interests you? If you're keen on plotting trajectories of spacecraft /asteroids/planets, then I'm sure an aerospace engineering degree focused on celestial mechanics would be very beneficial to you. If you want to model star formation, aerospace engineering isn't what you're wanting.
 
  • #3
There aren't a lot of jobs in astrophysics, and it doesn't have a lot of applications - so most of the jobs are at colleges and universities. If you want to avoid that, you won't be left with a ton of options. And it doesn't pay nearly as well as some of the other, more practical fields of physics that you can use to get an industry job - like optics, condensed matter, medical physics, biophysics, materials science, and more.
 

1. What is the difference between a physicist and a professor?

A physicist is a scientist who studies the properties and behavior of matter and energy. They conduct research, develop theories, and perform experiments to better understand the physical world. A professor, on the other hand, is a title given to a person who teaches at a college or university, often with a focus on a specific subject such as physics. Not all physicists are professors, and not all professors are physicists.

2. Can a physicist work in a field other than academia?

Yes, absolutely. While many physicists do work in academia as professors, there are many other career opportunities for physicists. They can work in research and development for government agencies or private companies, in technology and engineering, in healthcare, and even in finance. The skills and knowledge gained from studying physics can be applied to a variety of industries and fields.

3. Do physicists without a professor title have the same level of expertise?

Yes, a physicist who is not a professor can still have the same level of expertise and knowledge in their field. The title of professor is often associated with teaching and tenure at a university, but it does not necessarily reflect the level of expertise or contribution to the field. Many physicists who are not professors are still highly respected and renowned in their areas of research.

4. Are there any advantages to being a physicist without being a professor?

There are certainly advantages to being a physicist without being a professor. For one, it allows for more flexibility in terms of career paths and opportunities. Physicists who are not professors have the freedom to work in different industries and pursue different research interests without the constraints of a tenure track position. They also have the potential for a better work-life balance and may not have as many administrative responsibilities as professors.

5. Can a physicist without a professor title still make significant contributions to the field of physics?

Absolutely. Many of the groundbreaking discoveries and advancements in the field of physics have been made by individuals who were not professors. The title of professor does not determine one's ability to contribute to the field. As long as a physicist is conducting research and publishing their findings, they can make significant contributions to the field of physics regardless of their title.

Similar threads

Which Major Should I Choose for Astrophysics Professor Career?
    • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
60
Views
3K
Aeronautical Engineering or Nuclear Engineering?
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
1K
Programs Engineering Physics or Astronautics?
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
718
Other Masters in Physics after working in Engineering
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
321
Programs I'm a medical physicist, how can I get into astronomy/astrophysics?
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
26
Views
2K
Courses Is switching to astrophysics a better option for my future career?
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
1K
Getting into an engineering career with no degree...
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
12
Views
1K
Programs Astrophysics or planetary science?
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
1K
Courses Help choosing modules for electrical engineer - electronics degree
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
839
Is electrical engineering a good major for machine learning/AI jobs?
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
84

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top