1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Physics collisions

  1. Jun 4, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    A 50g object is moving east at 0.3 m/s. A 100g object is moving east as well at 0.25 m/s. These objects have an inelastic collision.

    a) Find their final velocity
    b) Find the kinetic energy lost

    2. Relevant equations
    P1 + P2 = P3 + P4 ; momentum is conserved
    Ek = 1/2 mv^2

    3. The attempt at a solution
    So the only thing conserved is momentum

    Please excuse me for not using units, it's too confusing to do that on a keyboard.

    a) (0.3 * 50/1000 + 0.25 * 100/1000) / (150/1000) = vf = 4 / 15 m/s

    b) Ek1 = 0.5 * (50/1000) * 0.3^2 + 0.5 * (100/1000) * 0.25^2 = 0.005375 J
    Ek2 = 0.5 * (50/1000) * (4/15)^2 + 0.5 * (100/1000) * (4/15)^2= 0.00533333333J

    Ek1 - Ek2 = 0.000042 J

    Is this correct? Someone said that its Ek2 - Ek1 but that doesn't make sense to me, because then delta(Ek) would be negative and this is impossible. Also, 10 marbles - 3 marbles. 7 were lost
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 4, 2013 #2
    Strictly speaking, ##\Delta E## of the system is negative; there's nothing wrong with that. The negative sign corresponds to a loss of energy. ##\Delta E## is defined as ##E_{f} - E_{i}##

    If you want to phrase it in terms of energy lost, then simply take the absolute value when intepreting the answer. It's generally not good practice to nudge your answer into a positive value "by hand" as the sign carries physical meaning (and it also confuses you - subtract which from which?)
  4. Jun 4, 2013 #3
    Ah I see, but isnt Einitial - Efinal also correct?
  5. Jun 4, 2013 #4
    It gives you the answer you wanted in this case, but I emphasize that understanding general principle(s) and idea(s) is more important. That is, it is perfectly fine to use so-called "shortcuts" like this while solving problems, but it is essential to know what exactly you are doing when you use them.
  6. Jun 5, 2013 #5
    Okay, thank you for the advice. I think that I will try harder to understand the principals.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: Physics collisions