- #1
creepypasta13
- 375
- 0
So I'm curious as to how much upper-div and graduate-level physics is actually used in astronomy (grad-level courses), since I hear a lot that they're very related. I'm pretty interested in the research in numerical simulations of star and galaxy formation.
I've seen some general lecture notes for upper-div Star Formation classes, and it looked pretty interesting as it used concepts from classical physics, a little quantum, and almost no E&M. But I saw some lecture notes for a Black Holes and Galaxies class, and it used a lot of special and general relativity, which I hate. What else should I expect at the graduate level? Does it get as difficult as the level of Jackson's E&M?
I've seen some general lecture notes for upper-div Star Formation classes, and it looked pretty interesting as it used concepts from classical physics, a little quantum, and almost no E&M. But I saw some lecture notes for a Black Holes and Galaxies class, and it used a lot of special and general relativity, which I hate. What else should I expect at the graduate level? Does it get as difficult as the level of Jackson's E&M?