- #1

- 11

- 0

I thought pions were assigned parity of -1, but how then can the Pi0 decay into two photons with parity -1?? What am I missing?

Thanks,

Joe

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Joe1
- Start date

- #1

- 11

- 0

I thought pions were assigned parity of -1, but how then can the Pi0 decay into two photons with parity -1?? What am I missing?

Thanks,

Joe

- #2

- 236

- 0

But this decay as far as I know is due to the electromagnetic force, there should be no parity violation..

can someone explain this?

- #3

CarlB

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 1,214

- 13

Neutral pions decay quickly by electromagnetic means. You can think of it as a single quark having two electromagnetic interactions that send off gamma rays, and then goes backwards in time (and is the antiquark).

The total parity for the two photons is still negative. Each photon contributes -1, and their wave function gives a third -1. (-1)^3 = -1.

[edit]Here's a short link: http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9058495/parity.[/edit]

The total parity for the two photons is still negative. Each photon contributes -1, and their wave function gives a third -1. (-1)^3 = -1.

[edit]Here's a short link: http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9058495/parity.[/edit]

Last edited:

- #4

Meir Achuz

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 3,529

- 114

If the parity is positive, the linear polarization of the two photons would be in the same direction, corresponding to the scalar E.E.

For negative parity, the polarizations would be perpendicular, corresponding to the pseudoscalar E.B.

Yang actually did it in terms of the corresponding circular polarization correlations, relating them to the zero spin of the pi0.

It is also of interest to note that the experiment is an example of EPR, since measuring one photon polarization determines the other. How could such a simple experiment confuse Einstein is the real EPR paradox.

- #5

- 184

- 1

If the parity is positive, the linear polarization of the two photons would be in the same direction, corresponding to the scalar E.E.

For negative parity, the polarizations would be perpendicular, corresponding to the pseudoscalar E.B.

Yang actually did it in terms of the corresponding circular polarization correlations, relating them to the zero spin of the pi0.

It is also of interest to note that the experiment is an example of EPR, since measuring one photon polarization determines the other. How could such a simple experiment confuse Einstein is the real EPR paradox.

It should also be noted that the pion decay to two photons cannot be treated in the standard VMD method, but instead follows from the axial anomaly because of the orientation of polarizations. Hence, the only calculation that gives the proper decay width of the pion is derived solely from the axial anomaly.

- #6

- 11

- 0

Thanks everyone!

Share: