Plasma - Debye Shielding

  • #1
402
1
Hi Guyz,

Why the results in the paper i've attached aren't like the results I got in my pdf?

Please look at the paper in the last line, the second term doesn't correspond to what I calculated, What i calculated is in the pdf file, is it wrong?

Why in my work there is exponential terms while it's not in the paper?

Thank you for reading
 

Attachments

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
19,021
2,384
Expand the exponential in terms of an infinite series, and ignore higher order terms, e.g. 1/T2 and higher, which one can do with reasonable accuracy for small arguments.
 
  • #3
402
1
What you said might be correct if the terms are added, but they are subtracted, that means this will happen

e^x=1+x+0.5 x^2
e^-x=1-x+0.5 x^2

(e^x)-(e^-x)=(1+x+0.5 x^2)-(1-x+0.5 x^2)=((((2x))))

That means a linear term value will remain and must be multiplied in the term, Right? and this doesn't agree with the paper :(

Thank you anyway,

Any other ideas?
 
  • #4
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
19,021
2,384
I believe if one uses the fact that ei = -ee = e, then the second term is multiplied by -1, and

e (e^x) - -e (e^-x) = e (1 + x + . . . ) + e (1 - x + . . .) = 2e (x), where

x = -e ([tex]\delta\phi[/tex]) / T

and the expression becomes

-2 e2 ([tex]\delta\phi[/tex]) / T

as in the paper or text.
 
  • #5
402
1
Mr. Astronuc, Can you please check what i've written in the PDF?

if we did as you said then there will be more items multplied in the term, can you tell me what's the problem in the PDF? why it's not like the paper if we expanded the exponential terms in series?

Thank you
 

Related Threads on Plasma - Debye Shielding

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
22K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
948
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
907
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
7K
Top