1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

PLEASE help Simple question on FBD assumption

  1. Jan 11, 2008 #1
    So I have this problem and I can't move on until i got this assumption cleared up. Looking at this truss

    If we look at the entire truss' FBD we have reactions in the x,y directions at
    B and a reaction in the x direction at C.

    Now I know by inspection that C_x and B_x are in the same direction (in the negative x direction). But, for the sake of consistency I will assume that all forces are in the POSITIVE direction. After solving my equations of equilibrium, I know that a negative sign will mean that the assumed direction was incorrect.

    I solved for C_x directly by taking the moments about B.
    [tex]\sum M_B=0\Rightarrow 1(10)+2(8)+2(C_x)=0\Rightarrow C_x=-13kN[/tex]

    The neg sign shows that C_x is indeed leftwards. Now to find B_x I used Sum of Forces.
    this time I used the REVISED sense of C_x and the ASSUMED sense of B_x:

    This gives me [tex]B_x-13kN=0\Rightarrow B_x=13kN[/tex] which seems to be a conflict. Why would B_x be positive. Clearly it should have the same sign as C_x.

    Where have I gone completely awry?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 11, 2008 #2


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    The x-reactions at B and C are in opposite directions. B is under tension, while C is in compression. The two load P1 and P2 pivot about B, pushing on C.

    In contrast, load P1 and P2 pivot about C pulling on B.

    One has to calculate the moments about B and C, due to P1, P2 and the other reaction.

    There is a vertical reaction at B, which is just the sum of P1 and P2, since the roller at C provides no reaction.
  4. Jan 11, 2008 #3
    Yeah Nuc!! Thanks! I have always trusted the math over my intuition and it is a problem such as this that confirms my trust in math over myself! It seems like I have to make every mistake that exists at least once before I can predict future ones of the like.

    Hopefully that will change, otherwise I will make a lethal engineer!:uhh:
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: PLEASE help Simple question on FBD assumption
  1. FBD Help, please! (Replies: 3)