Poincare Hypothesis Proof (Maybe?)

  • Thread starter climbhi
  • Start date

climbhi

The New York Times did an article today about a Russian mathemetician who claims to have proved the Poincare Hypothesis. In good Andrew Wiles fashion his proof is actually much further reaching results with the actuall proof of Poincare's Hypothesis dropping out of the larger result. Thought you might want to check it out: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/15/science/15MATH.html
 
499
1
excellent
 

climbhi

This article talked a little about Andrew Wiles proof of FLT too. It mentioned that a flaw was found in it and that he worked for months to fix it with one of his students. I've heard all sorts of things about Andrew Wiles's proof. So maybe some one can set the record straight for me. Is Andrew Wiles's proof of FLT considered valid today, or is it still thought of as flawed?
 

suffian

it's valid today. he did fix it.
 

Related Threads for: Poincare Hypothesis Proof (Maybe?)

  • Posted
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Posted
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top