(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Parts vii and viii of problem 2 of the attached file "hw5.pdf". It's too long and I'm too lazy to type it here.

2. Relevant equations

A useful equality of Levi-Civita symbol:

[itex]\epsilon_{ijk}\epsilon_{i'j'k}=\delta_{ii'}\delta_{jj'} - \delta_{ij'}\delta_{ji'}[/itex]

3. The attempt at a solution

I calculated the Poission brackets of those two expressions and none of them satisfies the definition of a rank two tensor given in the problem, although they are tensors according to the usual definition. The file "solutions5.pdf" contains the solution by the instructor or TAs. But I think the last equality of the proof of "fact 4" is incorrect: How can the following expression holds?

[itex]-\delta_{ji}f_k + \delta_{ki}f_j = \epsilon_{ijk}f_i[/itex]

If this is wrong, the solutions of parts vii and viii will be meaningless.

In quantum mechanics, scalars and vectors are defined using commutators [itex][L_i, V_j]=i\hbar\epsilon_{ijk}V_k[/itex], exactly the same algebra as in our problem. But no one defines Cartesian tensors using commutators/Poission brackets. I think Cartesian rank-two tensors could not be defined by simply generalizing the definition of a vector like in this problem.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Homework Help: Poission Bracket of Angular Momentum

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**