Can a civilization gather information from inside the event horizon?

In summary, the conversation discusses the scenario of using a magnetically reinforced pole to extend past the event horizon of two equally gravitational black holes. However, it is concluded that due to the infinite distance and space contraction at the event horizon, the pole would break and information cannot be received from inside the event horizon. The exact proper distance to the event horizon is also mentioned.
  • #1
spikenigma
61
0
'Poking' the Event Horizon

Forgive what is probably a ridiculous scenario, I was having a discussion earlier :smile:

We have Black Hole A and Black Hole B of completely (or near) equal gravitational field strength.

http://img148.imageshack.us/my.php?image=blackhole1.gif

A civilization has developed a magnetically re-enforced pole.

The pole is made up of smaller segments which produce a magnetic/dimagnetic field of arbitrary strength to hold it together and directly counteract gravity/gravitational distortions/stresses

The energy requirements of each segment can be easily met by the civilization at any time as needed - as long as it is not infinity.

The civilization extends the pole towards Black Hole A and Black Hole B (carefully)

http://img530.imageshack.us/my.php?image=blackhole2.gif

The pole extends past the event horizon of each Black Hole

http://img530.imageshack.us/my.php?image=blackhole3.gif

assume time dilation is not an issue to the experimenters

questions:

* what happens?
* can the civilization theoretically receive information at speed of sound from the pole about the inside of the event horizon?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
spikenigma said:
* what happens?
The pole breaks apart.
 
  • #3
Space is increasingly contracted radially as the even horizon is approached. At the event horizon space is contracted to zero. An infinite distance exists between the pole and the event horizon.
 
  • #4
skeptic2 said:
Space is increasingly contracted radially as the even horizon is approached. At the event horizon space is contracted to zero. An infinite distance exists between the pole and the event horizon.
Huh? This makes no sense at all.
 
  • #5
Space is contracted by the factor sqrt(1 - Vesc^2 / c^2) where Vesc is the escape velocity. At the event horizon where Vesc = c space is contracted to zero resulting in an infinite distance between any object and the event horizon.

Time dilation is not the only impediment to crossing the event horizon. Just as an infinite amount of time must pass before an object can cross the event horizon, an infinite distance must also be crossed.
 
  • #6
At the event horizon where Vesc = c space is contracted to zero resulting in an infinite distance between any object and the event horizon.
A singularity in the derivative does not necessarily mean a singularity of the function (proper distance as a function of "r") itself. In fact, the distance is finite.
 
  • #7
skeptic2 said:
Space is contracted by the factor sqrt(1 - Vesc^2 / c^2) where Vesc is the escape velocity. At the event horizon where Vesc = c space is contracted to zero resulting in an infinite distance between any object and the event horizon.

Hi Skeptic2

[itex]dr'=dr\sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)[/itex] only applies to the free-falling object that is falling at [itex]v=-\sqrt(2M/r)\,c[/itex] towards the BH, this is the process that means dr always equals 1 for the object free-falling from infinity (as the length contraction due to velocity (SR) cancels out the length expansion, [itex]dr'=dr\sqrt(1-2M/r)^{-1}[/itex] brought on by gravity (GR)). Only the static observer deep within the BH's gravitation field comes close to experiencing the 'infinite' curvature near the horizon. For the static observer, the distance to the EH is-

[tex]\Delta r'=\frac{\Delta r}{\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{2M+\Delta r}}}[/tex]

where Δr is the coordinate distance to the EH (distance as observed from infinity) and Δr' is the proper distance to the EH (distance as observed locally from the object within the gravitational field) and M=Gm/c2.

As it's already been pointed out, even without massive tidal forces near the event horizon, the pole would break simply due to the space-like geodesics that reside on the inside of the event horizon (i.e. no object can remain static at a coordinate distance r inside the EH).
 
Last edited:
  • #8
The exact "proper distance" is, without approximation:
[tex]S=r_2\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r_2}}-r_1\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r_1}}+M\ln{\frac{r_2-M+r_2\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r_2}}}{r_1-M+r_1\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r_1}}}}[/tex]
(I think), which is finite even for r1=2M.
 

1. What is the event horizon?

The event horizon is the boundary surrounding a black hole where the gravitational pull becomes so strong that nothing, including light, can escape.

2. Why is it called 'poking' the event horizon?

This term is used to describe the action of sending a probe or spacecraft close enough to the event horizon to gather data or study the effects of the black hole's gravity.

3. Is it safe to 'poke' the event horizon?

No, it is not safe to 'poke' the event horizon. The extreme gravitational forces near the event horizon can cause significant damage to any object that gets too close.

4. What can we learn from 'poking' the event horizon?

By studying the effects of the event horizon, scientists can gain a better understanding of the nature of black holes and the laws of physics in extreme environments.

5. How do we 'poke' the event horizon?

Currently, the only way to 'poke' the event horizon is by using remote probes or spacecraft equipped with advanced technology that can withstand the intense gravitational forces near the black hole.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
487
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
Back
Top