As I understand it, the polar coordinates of a point is defined by the rectangular coordinates of that point according to the transformation T from R² to R² defined by(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]T:(x,y)\mapsto (\sqrt{x^2+y^2},tan\left(\frac{y}{x}\right))[/tex]

But this definition fails for y=pi and x=2 because tan(pi/2) is not defined.

We could defined it this way for [itex](x,y)\in \mathbb{R}^2 \backslash \{(x,y) \ \vert \ y/x = (n+1/2)\pi, \ n\in \mathbb{Z}\}[/itex], and by

[tex]T:(x,y)\mapsto (\sqrt{x^2+y^2}, Arccos_n \left(\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}\right))[/tex]

for [itex](x,y) \in \{(x,y) \ \vert \ y/x = (n+1/2)\pi, \ n\in \mathbb{Z}\}[/itex] and where Arccos_n is the inverse function of cos in the interval containing (n+1/2)pi.. i.e. [itex]Arccos_n(z): [-1,1]\rightarrow [n\pi, (n+1)\pi][/itex].

This is phenomenally ugly. Is there a nicer way to define the polar coordinates?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Polar coordinates?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**