Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Polar vector coordinates

  1. Sep 2, 2007 #1
    i dont understand the point of [itex]\hat{\theta}[/itex] if a vector is completely described by [itex] \textbf{r}=r \hat{\textbf{r}}[/itex]

    btw tex is doing something weird, apparently i can't make greek letters bold
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 2, 2007 #2
    no one of you math geniuses can answer this for me?
  4. Sep 3, 2007 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I don't pretend to be a math genius but perhaps none of them understands your question. What do you mean by "a vector is completely described by [itex] \textbf{r}=r \hat{\textbf{r}}[/itex]". Are you talking about a specific vector? Because that certainly does not "completely describe" a general vector. If you have a vector "completely described" by [itex] \textbf{r}=r \hat{\textbf{r}}[/itex] then you don't need [itex]\theta'[/itex].

    If you have formulas for both r' and [itex]\theta'[/itex], what makes you think that the vector is "completely described" by [itex] \textbf{r}=r \hat{\textbf{r}}[/itex]
    ? Perhaps it would help if you stated the precise problem.
  5. Sep 3, 2007 #4


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    [tex]\hat{\textbf{r}}[/itex] depends on [tex]\theta[/tex]... It changes according to the angle. Unless you know what [tex]\theta[/tex] is you can't draw [tex]\hat{\textbf{r}}[/itex]
  6. Sep 3, 2007 #5
    does [itex]\textbf{r}[/itex] describe a general vector in cartesian coordinates? if it does then i don't see any difference between the position vector in cartesian coordinates and in polar coordinates.

    in fact i don't even understand the physical meaning of a linear combination of [itex]\hat{\textbf{r}}[/itex] and [itex]\hat{\theta}[/itex]. actually that is erroneous , i have no problem visualizing the resultant of these two vectors, i would just need to connect them head to tail. what i don't understand is what i said before, what is the point of the [itex]\hat{\theta}}[/itex]

    the picture represents my understanding of the the polar coordinates in terms of the cartesian coordinates where [itex]\textbf{A}[/itex] is the vector i'm trying to describe in terms of the the polar unit vectors. is it correct? and if it is correct why can't describe [itex]\textbf{A}[/itex] by just scaling the [itex]\hat{\textbf{r}}[/itex] a little and making its [itex]\theta[/itex] argument little bigger?

    Attached Files:

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook