Polarization of light problem

  • #1
johnsobertstamos
10
1
Homework Statement:
A series of polarizers are each placed at a 12 ∘ interval from the previous polarizer. Unpolarized light is incident on this series of polarizers. How many polarizers does the light have to go through before it is 1/9 of its original intensity?
Relevant Equations:
I = Io (cos theta)^2
Iintensity polarized = 1/2 Intensity unpolarized
I set up the equation

.5((cos 12)^2)^x = 1/9

Solving for x gets me 34.037

34 + 1 = 35

I've entered answers of both 34 and 35 and both have been marked as wrong. Does anybody know what I'm doing wrong here?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
berkeman
Mentor
64,453
15,827
Welcome to the PF.
How many polarizers does the light have to go through before it is 19 of its original intensity?
19 what of its original intensity? 19%?
 
  • #3
johnsobertstamos
10
1
Welcome to the PF.

19 what of its original intensity? 19%?
Sorry, should be 1/9
 
  • #4
johnsobertstamos
10
1
Ah, okay thanks.

Do both of those equations apply to the first and all subsequent polarization stages?
The bottom one applies to just the first, reducing the intensity by half. The top one applies to the rest of the polarization stages.
 
  • #5
berkeman
Mentor
64,453
15,827
.5((cos 12)^2)^x = 1/9

Solving for x gets me 34.037

34 + 1 = 35
I get a different value of x for the solution of that equation, where x is the number of polarizers after the first one. Could you show your work so we can check it please? Thanks. :smile:

[tex]I(x) = \frac{1}{2} [cos^2(12)]^x[/tex]
 
  • #6
berkeman
Mentor
64,453
15,827
The bottom one applies to just the first, reducing the intensity by half. The top one applies to the rest of the polarization stages.
Yes, sorry, I deleted my post after I made it because I realized that you had already factored that in. Please check out the reply that I just made. Thanks.
 
  • #7
gneill
Mentor
20,948
2,892
"How many polarizers does the light have to go through before it is 1/9 of its original intensity?"

Is that the exact phrasing of the original problem statement? Perhaps it says something equivalent to "less than 1/9 of the original intensity"? In that case the ".037" in the resulting calculation might play a role... Just a thought.
 
  • #8
johnsobertstamos
10
1
"How many polarizers does the light have to go through before it is 1/9 of its original intensity?"

Is that the exact phrasing of the original problem statement? Perhaps it says something equivalent to "less than 1/9 of the original intensity"? In that case the ".037" in the resulting calculation might play a role... Just a thought.
That's the phrasing given in the problem. I also forgot to mention it asks for the answer in the form of an integer.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
johnsobertstamos
10
1
I get a different value of x for the solution of that equation, where x is the number of polarizers after the first one. Could you show your work so we can check it please? Thanks. :smile:

[tex]I(x) = \frac{1}{2} [cos^2(12)]^x[/tex]


1) .5((cos 12)^2)^x = 1/9

2) ((cos 12)^2)^x = 2/9

3) x ln((cos 12)^2) = ln (2/9)

4) x = (ln (2/9)) / ln((cos 12)^2)

5) x = 34.037
 
  • #10
johnsobertstamos
10
1
Still at a complete loss for what I'm doing wrong here. My math checks out every time.
 
  • #11
berkeman
Mentor
64,453
15,827
2) ((cos 12)^2)^x = 2/9

3) x ln((cos 12)^2) = ln (2/9)
I think you should be using log(), not ln()... :smile:
 
  • #12
johnsobertstamos
10
1
I think you should be using log(), not ln()... :smile:
It gets me the same answer of 34.037 Any differences in the equations we have set up?
 
  • #13
johnsobertstamos
10
1
I'm inputting

x = log(2/9) / log((cos 12)^2)

x = 34.037
 
  • #14
berkeman
Mentor
64,453
15,827
Hmm, I found an error by a factor of 2 just now in my previous calculation, and now I get the same as you: 1+34=35. Can you check with a TA or the instructor?
 
  • #15
TSny
Homework Helper
Gold Member
13,964
4,138
".037" in the resulting calculation might play a role... Just a thought.
Right. With 35 filters I get that the resulting intensity is still a wee bit above 1/9 the initial intensity.
 
  • #16
johnsobertstamos
10
1
Right. With 35 filters I get that the resulting intensity is still a wee bit above 1/9 the initial intensity.
Ah so maybe it's 36 then
 
  • #17
berkeman
Mentor
64,453
15,827
That seems like the most likely option at this point. Can you check it?
 
  • #18
johnsobertstamos
10
1
That seems like the most likely option at this point. Can you check it?
Yep 36, thank you everybody for your help. Much appreciated!
 

Suggested for: Polarization of light problem

Replies
25
Views
239
Replies
3
Views
508
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
527
Replies
5
Views
987
Replies
4
Views
265
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
329
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
764
Replies
0
Views
293
Top