1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Polarization of light

  1. May 21, 2007 #1
    So from what I understand, right handed circularly polarized light has angular momentum +1,
    left handed circularly polarized light has angular momentum -1.
    What is the angular momentum of linear polarized light?
  2. jcsd
  3. May 21, 2007 #2

    Claude Bile

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Are you referring to the angular momentum of a photon with circular polarisation? Or are you referring to the angular momentum of a classical wave?

    Also, when you say +1, what quantity are you referring to, the angular momentum itself (in which case you should denote units) or the quantum number associated with angular momentum?

  4. May 21, 2007 #3
    i guess i'm referring to the quantum number of the photon. but i'm interested in the classical answer too if there is one.
  5. May 21, 2007 #4

    Claude Bile

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    For a single photon, the quantum number for angular momentum must be +/- 1, sometimes we say that the photon has spin +/- 1.

    For a collection of photon with linear polarisation, we can regard half has having spin +1 and half as having spin -1 (with spin +1 corresponding to left hand and spin -1 corresponding to right hand circular polarisation). The average angular momentum from a group of linearly polarised photons is therefore 0.

  6. May 22, 2007 #5

    Meir Achuz

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    There is actually a mismatch between the definition of circular polalrization
    (R and L) and the photon spin direction. The photons of R polarized light are actually left handed. That is they have negative helicity, or spin component
    of -hbar (or -1 in units where hbar is absent). The reason for this difference is that opticians define the rotation of the E vector as you look toward the light. Particlelists define the spin of the photon in the direction of advance of the light.

    Classical light is the case when the number of photons is so large that the amplitude seems continuous. The angular momentum of classical L polarized light of a pure frequency would be n hbar, where n is the number of photons.
  7. May 22, 2007 #6
    Sorry if I ought to start a new thread with this, but can anybody tell me:

    Can a single photon exhibit linear polarisation?

    What's the difference between polarization plane and polarization?
  8. May 22, 2007 #7
    I thought that non polarized light would have avg. ang. mom. of 0, because it is have left handed and half right handed. It seems that linear polarized light is a different situation. You see what I'm saying?
  9. May 22, 2007 #8

    Claude Bile

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Voltage - The polarisation of an EM wave is typically defined as the direction of the E-field vector, with the polarisation plane being the plane defined by the E-field vector and the wave-vector, k.

    Voltage, BeauGeste - The question of whether a single photon can possess a linear polarisation pushes the edge of my knowledge to be honest. While a single photon must possess angular momentum of +/- h-bar units, a photon can exist in a superposition of two states with the photon having a 50% probability of becoming either RH or LH polarised when a "measurement" is performed. You could perhaps call a photon in such a superposition of states a single photon with linear polarisation. You could similarly regard an unpolarised photon as being in a superposition of two orthogonal linearly polarised states. (I would recommend asking this question again in the QM forums, you will most likely get a more accurate answer there.)

    The bottom line though is that a photon MUST have a momentum of either +/- h-bar units.

  10. May 23, 2007 #9
    Classically, BeauGeste, it is different because you are not dealing with discrete particles but with continuous electric field amplitudes. Classically, circular polarization is composed of two linear polarized waves (of equal amplitude) oriented orthogonal to each other which are simply out of phase by 90 degrees.
    The resulting superposition of the electric fields creates a continuosly rotating electric field vector thru space.

    This can be seen experimentally simply by sending linear polarized light through a 'quarter wave' plate, creating circular polarized light.

    Of course, classically, I don't think linear polarized waves have a net angular moment, but rather have a transverse oscillating field which can been seen in the effect on charges in matter as the wave passes through.
    And they do have linear momentum (as per the Poyting vector) in the direction of propogation.


    "Never eat more than you can lift" - Ms. Piggy
    Last edited: May 23, 2007
  11. May 23, 2007 #10
    Many thanks Claude and Creator.
  12. May 24, 2007 #11
    With you

    I would like to know first of alll what is right handed circularly polarized light and left handed circularly polarized light ??
  13. May 24, 2007 #12
    Are we talking about them being out of phase by 90 degrees in a left handed direction or a right handed direction? Like by +90 or -90 degrees, perhaps better expressed as 90 degrees or 270 degrees?
  14. May 24, 2007 #13

    Here's a brief discription with diagrams so you can better visualize.


  15. May 24, 2007 #14
    Creator: many, many thanks.
  16. May 26, 2007 #15
    No problem Voltage.

    I guess, in light of BeauGeste's original question, I ought to address the angular momentum question classically also.

    Notice in my first post to him I mentioned (as did Claude) it is only the direction of the electric field vector, E, that defines polarization; but this says nothing of the angular momentum.

    Not so well known is the fact that, classically, standard Maxwell equations show there should be NO angular momentum vector directed along the direction of propogation ......however, this directly contradicts laser experiments which reveal angular momentum is transferred to objects in the path of circularly polarized light.:surprised

    Just thought that ought to be mentioned.....


    -Honk if you like peace and quiet.-:biggrin:
    Last edited: May 26, 2007
  17. May 27, 2007 #16
    I'm following the link creator provided, here


    According to this picture in the link below, we are looking to the light that is coming toward us. The text says:

    If this wave were approaching an observer, it electric vector would appear to be roting counterclockwise. This is called right-circular polarized.


    But right after that, it says:

    If while looking at the source, the electric vector of the light coming toward you appears to be rotating clockwise, the light is said to be right-circularly polarized

    That appears to be contrary!
  18. May 28, 2007 #17


    Good catch Weimin; its probably a typo.

  19. May 28, 2007 #18
    So which one is correct as I've seen different definitions of right and left circular polarizations from different books?
  20. May 29, 2007 #19

    Meir Achuz

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The key words are "If this wave were APPROACHING AN OBSERVER,".
    This is like looking at a transparent clock from behind.
    HE physicists do look at the wave this way, which is why they call L polarized light, "right handed".
  21. May 29, 2007 #20

    Me too; apparently left and right circular polarized light is dependent upon whether it is being observed by an engineer or a physicist...:rofl:

    The point is that neither is 'correct'; it is simply a matter of convention. ( maybe that's why someone invented quantum mechanics..:tongue2:)

    The thing to remember is that when the x component trails behind the y component by 90 degrees, the E vector rotates one way; when it preceeds the y component by 90 *, it rotates the other way.

    Here is a great animation for each direction, showing it clearly.

    http://www.enzim.hu/~szia/cddemo/edemo7.htm [Broken]

    By the way, two circularly polarized waves can also be out of phase by 90 degrees.....guess what you get?

    See here:
    http://www.enzim.hu/~szia/cddemo/edemo8.htm [Broken]

    This is simply a demo re-stating the fact that linearly (plane) polarized light is simply the superposition of two circularly polarized waves.

    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2017
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook