I Position in QFT

  • Thread starter WWCY
  • Start date
  • Tags
    qft
344
90
Only in nonrelativistic quantum field theory.
The equivalence is shown using 4-D delta functions, so it works in relativistic QFT.
 

A. Neumaier

Science Advisor
Insights Author
7,010
2,914
Feynman diagrams depicting S-matrix elements lead to the same result in both the space-time and the energy-momentum representation. The corresponding (amputated) time-ordered ##N##-point Green's functions are Fourier transforms of each other.
But if you take 4D Fourier transforms then the N-point Green's functions get N times, and can for N>2 no longer be interpreted in terms of inner products of multiparticle states (where there is one time only but multiple space coordinates).
 
344
90
But if you take 4D Fourier transforms then the N-point Green's functions get N times, and can for N>2 no longer be interpreted in terms of inner products of multiparticle states (where there is one time only but multiple space coordinates).
Expand it all out in terms of propagators and point vertices and the equivalence becomes trivial.
 

A. Neumaier

Science Advisor
Insights Author
7,010
2,914
Expand it all out in terms of propagators and point vertices and the equivalence becomes trivial.
I don't complain about the equivalence but about the interpretation that you give in post #38.
Applying two field operators gives a state with two time variables.
 
344
90
I don't complain about the equivalence but about the interpretation that you give in post #38.
Applying two field operators gives a state with two time variables.
Representing creation at X and destruction at Y. Or vice versa for the antiparticle.
 

A. Neumaier

Science Advisor
Insights Author
7,010
2,914
Representing creation at X and destruction at Y. Or vice versa for the antiparticle.
And what does ##\phi(x)\phi(y)\phi(z)|vac\rangle## with 4D ##x,y,z## represent? Surely not an ordinary wave function ket, which would be ##|x,y,z\rangle## with 3D position vectors ##x,y,z##.
 
619
98
And what does ##\phi(x)\phi(y)\phi(z)|vac\rangle## with 4D ##x,y,z## represent? Surely not an ordinary wave function ket, which would be ##|x,y,z\rangle## with 3D position vectors ##x,y,z##.
Is the whole idea of particle positions muddled by the lost simultaneity in relativistic quantum mechanics? As in, how do we make sense of unitary time evolution when particle positions defined at the same times are boosted to different times?
 

A. Neumaier

Science Advisor
Insights Author
7,010
2,914
Is the whole idea of particle positions muddled by the lost simultaneity in relativistic quantum mechanics?
Not only that of particle positions but that of more than one particle.

Even in classical relativity, there is no good relativistic multiparticle theory: see
  • Currie, Jordan and Sudarshan, Relativistic Invariance and Hamiltonian Theories of Interacting Particles, Reviews of Modern Physics 35 (1963), 350.
 
619
98
Not only that of particle positions but that of more than one particle.

Even in classical relativity, there is no good relativistic multiparticle theory: see
  • Currie, Jordan and Sudarshan, Relativistic Invariance and Hamiltonian Theories of Interacting Particles, Reviews of Modern Physics 35 (1963), 350.
Wasn’t there a recent textbook on classical electrodynamics where the problem of charged point particles interacting via dynamical fields was given a satisfactory treatment?
 

A. Neumaier

Science Advisor
Insights Author
7,010
2,914
Wasn’t there a recent textbook on classical electrodynamics where the problem of charged point particles interacting via dynamical fields was given a satisfactory treatment?
To my knowledge only the problem of a single point particle in a field is tractable, not that of several....
 
251
55
He said that this was down to the fact that we should be considering multi-particle states in relativistic situation, before introducing Fock-space states.
There have been already a lot of answers, I only want to quote the introduction of "quantum electrodynamics" by Beretetskii-Lifshitz-Pitaevskii
 

Attachments

vanhees71

Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
13,499
5,402
But if you take 4D Fourier transforms then the N-point Green's functions get N times, and can for N>2 no longer be interpreted in terms of inner products of multiparticle states (where there is one time only but multiple space coordinates).
Of course not. The QFT formalism automatically takes care of the Bose/Fermi (anti-)symmetrization.
 

Related Threads for: Position in QFT

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
447
  • Last Post
2
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Top