Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Position operator for a system of coupled harmonic oscillators

  1. Jul 2, 2012 #1
    Hi

    I would like to know if I have a system of coupled harmonic oscillators whether the standard position operator for an uncoupled oscillator is valid, i.e.
    [itex]x_i = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (a_i+a_i^\dagger)[/itex]?
    where i labels the ions.

    To give some context I am looking at a problem involving a linear ion trap. The hamiltonian for this system with N ions is given by something like

    [itex]H = \frac{1}{2m}\mathbf{p}^T \cdot \mathbf{p} +\omega \mathbf{x}^TB\mathbf{x} [/itex]

    where B is a coupling matrix and [itex]x_i[/itex] is a component of [itex]\mathbf{x}[/itex]

    This can be diagonalized in which case the Hamiltonian in the new coordinates (call them [itex]\mathbf{X}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{P}[/itex] ) looks like N uncoupled harmonic oscillators (with creation and annihilation operators [itex]A[/itex] and [itex]A^\dagger[/itex]) which describe the collective motion of the original system. Now the original position operator [itex]x_i[/itex] is as far as I have seen always written with respect to the the creation and annihilation operators of the new coordinates (uncoupled oscillators [itex]A[/itex] and [itex]A^\dagger[/itex])

    My question is would it be valid to write the position operator as I have done so above? and if so why is it more common to use the more commplicated expression in terms of [itex]A[/itex] and [itex]A^\dagger[/itex] as opposed to the one I have written?

    cheers

    Mark
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Position operator for a system of coupled harmonic oscillators
Loading...