Is There a Difference Between Positive and Negative Charge Light?

In summary: They will both affect a charge some distance away in exactly the same way - except that the charge being affected will be 'up' for the electron light and 'down' for the proton light (or vice versa)?
  • #1
k9b4
109
2
Is there any difference between light produced by a positive charge and light produced by a negative charge?
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #3
jedishrfu said:
what particles are you thinking of?
If I have an oscillating electron, and an oscillating proton, oscillating at exactly the same frequency, is there any difference between the electromagnetic radiation produced by these charges?

I imagine the electron radiation would repel other electrons, and the proton radiation would repel other protons?
 
  • #4
Is this a homework assignment? If so then what do you think?
 
  • #5
jedishrfu said:
Is this a homework assignment? If so then what do you think?
This is not a homework assignment.

I think the electron radiation would repel other electrons, and the proton radiation would repel other protons?
 
  • #6
The electromagnetic field generated from the oscillating charges vibrating at the same rate would be the same.

It wouldn't repel other like charges like you're thinking, it's not an electrostatic field.
 
  • #7
jedishrfu said:
The electromagnetic field generated from the oscillating charges vibrating at the same rate would be the same.

It wouldn't repel other like charges like you're thinking, it's not an electrostatic field.
Why wouldn't it?

Electromagnetic radiation contains an electric field. Electric field causes force on charged particles. Why does the electric field in electromagnetic radiation not repel and attract like other electric fields?
 
  • #8
k9b4 said:
This is not a homework assignment.

I think the electron radiation would repel other electrons, and the proton radiation would repel other protons?

That's not how EM waves work. EM waves are oscillations of the EM field vectors, meaning that the forces alternates from + to - and back in a direction that is perpendicular to the direction of propagation.
 
  • #9
Drakkith said:
the forces alternates from + to -
What does this part mean? What force alternates?
 
  • #10
k9b4 said:
What does this part mean? What force alternates?

The electric and magnetic forces alternate polarity (directions). If we use arrows to represent the forces, then the arrows will flip from one direction, to the opposite direction, and then back to the original direction once per cycle.
 
  • #11
Drakkith said:
The electric and magnetic forces alternate polarity (directions). If we use arrows to represent the forces, then the arrows will flip from one direction, to the opposite direction, and then back to the original direction once per cycle.
Hmmm okay.

So the only difference between electron light and proton light is the starting force polarity? One will start negative and the other positive?
 
  • #12
k9b4 said:
Hmmm okay.

So the only difference between electron light and proton light is the starting force polarity? One will start negative and the other positive?

I believe that is correct.
 
  • #13
Drakkith said:
I believe that is correct.
Cool thanks for explaining
 
  • #14
You could consider a source of EM radiation in terms of a radio transmitting antenna (and everything can scale, if you could get hold of a suitable 'transmitter' for light). The fields produced and the resulting radiated EM waves can be predicted by merely thinking of the currents sloshing up and down in the wire. This current is normally composed of moving electrons but it needn't be; no one worries about that in Antenna Theory. Point is that polarity of the moving charges doesn't have any bearing on the nature of the EM waves produced - it's just a Current. If you wanted to relate the radiated fields to the 'movement' involved, there would just be a 180 degree phase difference for the different polarities of the charge carriers.
 
  • #15
sophiecentaur said:
You could consider a source of EM radiation in terms of a radio transmitting antenna (and everything can scale, if you could get hold of a suitable 'transmitter' for light). The fields produced and the resulting radiated EM waves can be predicted by merely thinking of the currents sloshing up and down in the wire. This current is normally composed of moving electrons but it needn't be; no one worries about that in Antenna Theory. Point is that polarity of the moving charges doesn't have any bearing on the nature of the EM waves produced - it's just a Current. If you wanted to relate the radiated fields to the 'movement' involved, there would just be a 180 degree phase difference for the different polarities of the charge carriers.
To clarify - when the electric field vector points 'upwards', that means that a positive charge at that particular point will experience a force in the upwards direction?

So that means that electron light and proton light originating from exactly the same point and with exactly the same frequency will affect a charge some distance away in exactly the same way - except that the charge being affected will be 'up' for the electron light and 'down' for the proton light (or vice versa)?
 
Last edited:
  • #16
k9b4 said:
To clarify - when the electric field vector points 'upwards', that means that a positive charge at that particular point will experience a force in the upwards direction?

So that means that electron light and proton light originating from exactly the same point and with exactly the same frequency will affect a charge some distance away in exactly the same way - except that the charge being affected will be 'up' for the electron light and 'down' for the proton light (or vice versa)?
You would have no way of knowing what produced the wave, once it's been launched. There is only one kind of E field and H field.
You would be more likely to have success with Positrons in Anti Hydrogen atoms. I wonder if it's been done? Yes - it looks like it has.
 
  • #17
sophiecentaur said:
You would have no way of knowing what produced the wave, once it's been launched. There is only one kind of E field and H field.
You would be more likely to have success with Positrons in Anti Hydrogen atoms. I wonder if it's been done? Yes - it looks like it has.
But if (theoretically) both charges were in the same spot, and oscillating with the same frequency, their waves would be perfectly out of phase - right?
 
  • #18
They would both be modeled as precisely the same Current, but in anti phase, so - yes.
 

What is positive and negative light?

Positive and negative light refers to the polarity or charge of a light particle or photon. Just like atoms can have positive or negative charges, photons can also have positive or negative charges. This concept is also known as circular polarization, where the electric field of the photon rotates either clockwise or counterclockwise.

How is positive and negative light created?

Positive and negative light can be created through various processes such as scattering, refraction, or reflection. In these processes, the light particles interact with matter, causing them to become polarized and have a charge. Additionally, some light sources, such as lasers, can produce polarized light with a specific charge.

What is the significance of positive and negative light?

Positive and negative light have significant implications in various fields such as physics, astronomy, and technology. They can affect the behavior of light in different mediums, influence the properties of materials, and aid in the development of advanced technologies such as polarized sunglasses and optical communication systems.

Can positive and negative light cancel each other out?

Yes, positive and negative light can cancel each other out when they have equal and opposite charges. This phenomenon is known as destructive interference, where the two light waves combine and result in a net electric field of zero. This effect is commonly seen in polarized filters, where they block out certain types of polarized light.

How is positive and negative light used in everyday life?

Positive and negative light are used in a variety of applications in everyday life. Some examples include polarized sunglasses that reduce glare and improve visibility, liquid crystal displays (LCDs) that use polarized light to create images, and 3D movies that utilize circular polarization to create the illusion of depth. They are also used in various scientific instruments, such as polarimeters, to measure the rotation of polarized light.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
880
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
854
  • Optics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
870
Replies
5
Views
998
Back
Top