Potential above a charged shell

  • Thread starter Melawrghk
  • Start date
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
A very long insulating cylindrical shell of radius 6.90 cm carries charge of linear density 8.40 microC/m spread uniformly over its outer surface. Find the potential of a point located 4.4cm above the surface of the shell


2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution

I used Gaussian surface to find the electric field created by the shell outside (Q = linear charge density):
QL/[tex]\epsilon_{0}[/tex] = E*2*pi*d*L,
where L is length, d is distance to point from the axis of the cylinder.
The Ls cancel out, rearranging, I got:
E=[tex]\frac{Q}{2pi*d*\epsilon_{0}}[/tex]

I then integrated that to get the potential:
V=[tex]\frac{Q}{2pi*\epsilon_{0}} \int {(1/d)dd} [/tex]
The integral's upper limit is d-r, and lower limit is r.
I got the equation below as a result:
V=[tex]\frac{Q}{2pi*d*\epsilon_{0}} ln(\frac{d-r}{r})[/tex]

Substituting in the numbers I got V=-6.8*10^4, but that's wrong. Is it my method? Should I slice the cylinder into rings and do V from each one, then integrate the whole thing?

Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:

gabbagabbahey

Homework Helper
Gold Member
5,002
6
I then integrated that to get the potential:
V=[tex]\frac{Q}{2pi*d*\epsilon_{0}} \int {(1/d)dd} [/tex]
What's that extra 1/d doing out front of the integral?:wink:

The integral's upper limit is d-r, and lower limit is r.
Why is that?
 
What's that extra 1/d doing out front of the integral?:wink:



Why is that?
First one: typo, sorry :)

Second one: now that I think about, I'm not sure. I was thinking of using distance from the cylinder's axis and then r would be the smallest so that you're still on the outside (well, surface) and d-r would be anything beyond that. Should those limits be d and 0 instead?..

EDIT: I got it! Instead of using d as distance to center of the cylinder, I used d as distance to surface and for gaussian surface I had:
E=Q/(epsilon*2*pi*(d+r))
And integrated taht with upper limit being 'd' and lower being 0. And it worked! :D Thanks so much.
 
Last edited:

Want to reply to this thread?

"Potential above a charged shell" You must log in or register to reply here.

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top