I just made the following statement regarding two masses, M and m, in orbit about each other.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

"Btw, IIRC [and I may not be... I will check], as the potential energy of the gravitational field of M, wrt to m, is converted to kinetic energy in m, the mass of M decreases according Einstein's mass/energy relationship. As m loses kinetic energy to potential energy the mass M increases. This accounts for the energy storage and exchange.

Am I screwing this up or does memory serve correctly? It makes sense but that is usually a bad sign.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Potential energy question

Loading...

Similar Threads for Potential energy question |
---|

I A minus sign in the gravitational potential |

B Mass–energy equivalence: matter as potential energy? |

I Mass of potential energy in GR |

A Pressure and Newtonian potential energy |

B Negative potential energy and negative mass |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**