1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Potential in 1D and SHM.

  1. Apr 29, 2010 #1
    1D Potential
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Given:

    [tex] U(x) = U_0 - U_n*e^-(kx^2),[/tex] U_0, U_n and k are all constant.

    i) What is the maximum E for the particle to remain in potential?
    ii) Show that the potential has a minimum at x = 0.
    iii) If a particle of mass m is placed near the minimum at x = 0, and displaced slightly, show that it does shm. find the period of this motion.


    2. Relevant equations

    [tex]\frac{Df}{Dx} = -U(x)[/tex]

    3. The attempt at a solution

    i) First, when I received this problem, it was in very bad handwriting. My immediate thought for this part of the problem was to differentiate U(x) with respect to x since I know the relevant equation from above, make the function negative, and set it equal to zero. However, I don't think Energy and potential are related like that, since as far as I know, the force has that relationship, not the energy - and I know very well that force and energy have different units =).

    So my question for part i): Do you think I miswrote this problem? Does finding E-Max make sense given a potential?

    ii) I'm not very comfortable with this problem. To find minima, I differentiate and set equal to zero. Differentiating U(x), we get

    [tex]U(x) = -2xkU_n * e^(-kx^2)[/tex]

    And to find minima, we set U(x) to zero and solve for x.

    [tex] 0 = 2xkU_n, x = 0. [/tex]

    Then, I plug in values of -1 and 1 into the original equation, as well as zero, and zero clearly gives the lowest value (the x^2 ensures that!)

    Is that sufficient to prove that there is a minimum at x = 0?

    Finally,

    iii) If a particle of mass m is placed near the minimum at x = 0, and displaced slightly, show that it does simple harmonic motion. Find the period of this motion.

    Now this one, I'm a bit stumped on. While I don't know the graph of this motion, I do know that at x = 0 there is a minima, so it looks kind of like the minima in a parabola or something. (I believe this particle, at x = 0, is at 'stable' equilibrium, but I might be confusing terms...) treating this minima as a kind of 'ditch' that the particle cannot escape from without sufficient potential to overcome this 'ditch', the particle, starting at, say, -1, will start racing down, pass the ditch and, ignoring friction, make it to +1 before changing direction, passing x = 0 and moving back to -1. (oscillating!)

    Clearly, this is SHM, and I know that for a SHM, F = -kx. I don't really know how to show this mathematically though. I was planning on rearranging the potential formula so that it looked something like this:

    [tex] U(x) = U_0 - U_n*e^-kx^2, [/tex]

    [tex] U_0 - U(x) = U_n*e^-kx^2, Let [U_0 - U(x)]/(U_n) = Q,

    Q = e^-kx^2,

    LN(Q) = -kx^2, ... [/tex]

    But this feels definitely wrong.

    If anyone can help me out on this, I'd be very appreciative. Thanks for taking your time to help me =).
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 29, 2010 #2
    For the last part you need to expand the expression of potential (Taylor series) around the minimum and keep only the first term in the expansion.
    Keep in mind that the first order derivative is zero at the minimum so the first non-zero terms will be the one with the second derivative.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Potential in 1D and SHM.
  1. 1D motion (Replies: 5)

  2. 1d dynamics (Replies: 9)

Loading...