Power comparison

  • #1
What is better for power? 5 parts air at 400 psi compression 10 inch bore by 30 inch stroke compared to 800 psi compression with 1 part air with 10 inch bore with 10 inch stroke? Same air fuel ratio in both With diesel? Which will be more power and which will be more efficient? And why?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
jack action
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2,053
2,719
Compression ratio:
[tex]r = \left(\frac{P}{P_0}\right)^\frac{1}{1.4}[/tex]
where [itex]P_0[/itex] = 14.7 psi.

Engine 1 ([itex]P[/itex] = 400 psi): [itex]r = 10.59[/itex].
Engine 2 ([itex]P[/itex] = 800 psi): [itex]r = 17.37[/itex].

Diesel cycle thermal efficiency:

bfe6abacc1fdef67d1fc3dfcc72448eb.png


If we assume [itex]\alpha = 2[/itex] (cut-off ratio) and [itex]\gamma= 1.4[/itex], then:
[tex]\eta_{th} = 1 - \frac{1.17}{r^{0.4}}[/tex]
Engine 1: [itex]\eta_{th} = 0.544[/itex].
Engine 2: [itex]\eta_{th} = 0.626[/itex].

Engine 2 is more efficient.

Air volume per cycle (at atmospheric pressure):
[Here, I'm not sure what you mean by «5 parts air» and «1 part air»; I'm assuming you mean one engine's rpm is 5X faster than the other one or one has 5 cylinders and the other one has 1 cylinder]
[tex]V \propto ND^2S[/tex]
and the energy per cycle is:
[tex]E \propto \eta_{th}V[/tex]
[tex]\frac{E_1}{E_2} = \frac{\left(\eta_{th}ND^2S\right)_1}{\left(\eta_{th}ND^2S\right)_2} = \frac{0.544 \times 5 \times 10^2 \times 30}{0.626 \times 1 \times 10^2 \times 10} = 13[/tex]
Engine 1 should produce 13 times more power than engine 2.
 
  • Like
Likes Rx7man
  • #4
Compression ratio:
[tex]r = \left(\frac{P}{P_0}\right)^\frac{1}{1.4}[/tex]
where [itex]P_0[/itex] = 14.7 psi.

Engine 1 ([itex]P[/itex] = 400 psi): [itex]r = 10.59[/itex].
Engine 2 ([itex]P[/itex] = 800 psi): [itex]r = 17.37[/itex].

Diesel cycle thermal efficiency:

bfe6abacc1fdef67d1fc3dfcc72448eb.png


If we assume [itex]\alpha = 2[/itex] (cut-off ratio) and [itex]\gamma= 1.4[/itex], then:
[tex]\eta_{th} = 1 - \frac{1.17}{r^{0.4}}[/tex]
Engine 1: [itex]\eta_{th} = 0.544[/itex].
Engine 2: [itex]\eta_{th} = 0.626[/itex].

Engine 2 is more efficient.

Air volume per cycle (at atmospheric pressure):
[Here, I'm not sure what you mean by «5 parts air» and «1 part air»; I'm assuming you mean one engine's rpm is 5X faster than the other one or one has 5 cylinders and the other one has 1 cylinder]
[tex]V \propto ND^2S[/tex]
and the energy per cycle is:
[tex]E \propto \eta_{th}V[/tex]
[tex]\frac{E_1}{E_2} = \frac{\left(\eta_{th}ND^2S\right)_1}{\left(\eta_{th}ND^2S\right)_2} = \frac{0.544 \times 5 \times 10^2 \times 30}{0.626 \times 1 \times 10^2 \times 10} = 13[/tex]
Engine 1 should produce 13 times more power than engine 2.
By parts of air i mean volume of air.
 
  • #5
419
185
I still don't understand what you mean with that.. Volume has specific units, so giving us "parts of air" when you also mention bore, stroke, and compression pressure is all a bit confusing.
 
  • #6
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
10,532
2,298
+1

The volume of air drawn in is usually roughly equal to the displacement of the engine. Engine 2 has three times the displacement of Engine 1.
 

Related Threads on Power comparison

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
420
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
897
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
742
Replies
2
Views
787
Top